Country Case | Implementation Experience of School-Based HPV Vaccination in New South Wales, Australia

Australia has implemented a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program since 2007, making it one of the first countries in the world to introduce HPV vaccination into the national immunization schedule. After more than a decade of practice, Australia has achieved remarkable progress in population coverage, optimization of implementation strategies, and disease control outcomes, and is expected to become the first country globally to eliminate cervical cancer.

Recently, Vicky Sheppeard, Director of the South Eastern Sydney Public Health Unit of the New South Wales (NSW) Ministry of Health, was invited to participate in a VaxLab online seminar, where she provided a detailed introduction to the implementation of school-based HPV vaccination in the state and revealed the systemic support behind its high coverage rates. This article synthesizes publicly available literature and information shared during the seminar to outline the implementation experience of school-based HPV vaccination in NSW.

The History of School-Based Vaccination Programs

The development of school-based vaccination programs in Australia can be traced back to the 1930s. In 1971, NSW took the lead in establishing a structured school vaccination service by providing rubella vaccination to female students in senior secondary school. In urban areas, vaccination services were delivered by teams of immunization nurses, while in rural areas, they were implemented by community health staff. This model laid the foundation for the expansion of school-based vaccination systems over the following decades. Subsequently, vaccines such as measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (dTpa), hepatitis B, and varicella were gradually introduced into school vaccination programs. By the early 21st century, a relatively mature school-based vaccination network covering multiple age groups and diseases had been established.

In 1998, NSW conducted a catch-up MMR vaccination campaign targeting all primary school students, achieving a coverage rate of 75.4%. However, routine school vaccination services were temporarily interrupted following the completion of this program. Between 1999 and 2003, hepatitis B vaccination was shifted to general practice based implementation, resulting in a low coverage rate of only 18% through private sector service provision. This experience prompted policymakers to re-prioritize school-based vaccination.

In 2003, the implementation of the national meningococcal C vaccination program marked a critical turning point for school vaccination in NSW. This program delivered large-scale vaccination to all primary and the whole of high school students (Year 7-12), administering a total of 823,197 students and achieving coverage rates of 76% in both primary and high schools. It demonstrated the efficiency and accessibility of the school-based model and led to the re-establishment of routine adolescent vaccination programs in the state. In 2004, a statewide dTpa vaccination campaign targeting high school (Year 7-12) students during a pertussis outbreak further consolidated this model. Currently, school-based vaccination programs in NSW for adolescents include HPV vaccination, and dTpa vaccination for Year 7 students and meningococcal ACWY vaccination for Year 10 students.

Implementation of the National HPV Program at NSW

In 2007, Australia launched the world’s first government-funded national HPV vaccination program. Coverage estimates from that year showed that HPV vaccination rates in nearly all school cohorts in NSW exceeded 70%, placing it among the leading states nationwide.

In 2008, NSW formally introduced the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil 4) into school-based vaccination programs, initially targeting catch-up vaccination for older cohorts of secondary school girls. In the following years, HPV vaccination was gradually introduced into the routine immunization schedule for Year 7 students. In 2013, the program was expanded to boys, first through catch-up vaccination for older male students and subsequently through routine vaccination for Year 7 boys alongside girls, using a three-dose schedule at that time. In 2017, the schedule was simplified to two doses. In 2018, the nine-valent HPV vaccine (Gardasil 9) was introduced, also using a two-dose schedule. In 2023, the schedule was further simplified to a single-dose regimen.

New South Wales is the most populous state in Australia, divided into 15 local health districts (LHDs), with approximately 550 high schools (aged 12-18) and around 95,000 Year 7 cohorts annually. The state adopts a two-tier governance structure characterized by centralized coordination by the state health authority and decentralized implementation by local health districts, forming a closed-loop management system that integrates decision-making, execution, and feedback.

(1) Funding and Accessibility

The HPV vaccination program is jointly supported by the federal and state governments. Vaccines are procured by the federal government, while implementation costs are covered by the state government. Students receive vaccinations free of charge when vaccinated at school, and all adolescent vaccines included in the national immunization program are provided at no cost. If parents choose to have their children vaccinated at primary care facilities or pharmacies, the vaccine itself remains free, although service fees may be charged. Data indicate that more than 90% of students complete vaccination through school-based programs, demonstrating the significant advantages of this model in reducing financial barriers and improving accessibility.

(2) Governance: The Decision-Making and Implementation

In terms of governance structure, responsibilities are clearly divided and coordinated between decision-making and implementation. At the decision-making level, Health Protection NSW serves as the central authority responsible for strategic planning and overall supervision of the program. It provides all vaccines recommended and funded by the Australian government for adolescents and collaborates with the Department of Education, the Catholic Education Commission, and the Association of Independent Schools to secure policy support from the education sector. The state health authority ensures standardized operations across the state by developing annual implementation protocols and establishes informed consent mechanisms with multilingual informational materials to ensure accessibility and clarity. It also allocates funding to local health districts based on student population size and continuously monitors vaccination coverage, reporting data to support dynamic policy adjustments.

At the implementation level, the 15 local health districts are responsible for organizing vaccination activities within their jurisdictions. They coordinate directly with each high school to develop vaccination schedules tailored to local conditions, recruit and deploy trained registered nurses who are authorized to administer vaccines independently without a physician’s prescription, and manage vaccine procurement, storage, and cold chain logistics. Cold chain conditions are continuously monitored and recorded in accordance with national standards. Following vaccination, data are promptly reported to the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR). For students who are absent on vaccination days, catch-up services are arranged. For those unable to participate in school-based vaccination, alternative access through primary care providers is facilitated.

(3) End-to-End Service and Quality Management

The management of vaccination sessions follows principles of safety and human-centered care. Vaccination sites are divided into waiting, vaccination, and observation areas, which are clearly separated. Within the vaccination area, multiple nurse stations are set up, each consisting of one nurse and one student seat, with sufficient spacing to allow for one-on-one communication and to alleviate student anxiety. Students are required to remain under observation for 15 minutes after vaccination to ensure timely management of any adverse events.

Parental informed consent is a prerequisite for program implementation and is designed to balance convenience and accessibility. Since 2023, NSW has introduced an online consent platform linked to the government service portal. Parents can log in using their Service NSW account, provide their child’s personal information and both their own and their child’s health insurance numbers, and complete the consent process online. The platform provides materials in multiple community languages, including Chinese-language resources for parents of Year 7 students, to accommodate culturally diverse populations. Paper-based consent forms are still available, with approximately 20% of families continuing to use this option. Each method has its advantages and limitations.

Paper forms may be lost during transmission between schools and families, while online consent facilitates data reporting but may be overlooked if parents miss email notifications. Nurses often contact parents by phone on vaccination days to ensure completion. A key advantage of the online system is that consent records are directly integrated into the system, allowing nurses to access real-time information on consent status, vaccine types approved, and student eligibility. Once vaccination is completed and recorded, the student’s status is updated accordingly, and the data are automatically synchronized with the national immunization register, forming a closed data loop from consent to vaccination.

In addition, catch-up vaccination is treated as a critical component of the program. During each school visit, students who missed previous doses but have parental consent are offered vaccination. Students who initiate vaccination in Year 7 can continue to receive catch-up doses in subsequent years, such as during Year 10 vaccination sessions or during visits for new cohorts of Year 7 students. Free catch-up vaccination is available until the student’s 20th birthday. For those who are unable to complete vaccination at school, parents may take their children to local clinics or pharmacies.

NSW Health has also developed resource packages, including parent information kits, template letters, and communication materials, to support adolescent health services in engaging with schools. Each vaccine is accompanied by a dedicated parent information package that includes frequently asked questions about the vaccine and disease, consent forms with vaccination records, privacy statements, and contact information for public health units. Prior to vaccination, students receive information cards outlining key points they should understand about the vaccination process. The official website also provides comprehensive information for parents and students under the adolescent vaccination program section.

A robust data feedback system supports continuous monitoring and evaluation. AIR constitutes a lifelong national database of immunization records. This system serves two main functions. First, it enables individuals and healthcare providers to access vaccination histories conveniently, supporting clinical decision-making. Second, it provides a basis for calculating population-level vaccination coverage. As Australia has universal health insurance coverage, the system uses the health insurance cards as the denominator, allowing accurate estimation of the target population size and comparison of vaccination coverage across age groups.

Outcomes, Lessons Learned, and Emerging Challenges

Monitoring data from 2011 to 2024 shows that vaccination coverage for school-based programs in NSW has remained stable at approximately 80%. Although the initial uptake of the meningococcal ACWY vaccine was slightly lower, it has now reached levels comparable to those of the HPV and dTpa vaccines. Following the inclusion of boys in the HPV vaccination program in 2013, coverage rates between males and females have been largely equivalent.

Under sustained high coverage, equity has been consistently maintained. Quantitative studies indicate that vaccination rates are not influenced by socioeconomic status, language background, or school type, including public, religious, and private institutions. This outcome reflects the combined effects of free vaccination policies, multilingual communication strategies, and standardized school-based delivery, ensuring equal access for students from diverse backgrounds.

Research has also identified multiple factors influencing vaccination uptake. At the school level, students in single-sex schools tend to have higher vaccination rates than those in coeducational settings, and student attendance plays a fundamental role. At the interpersonal level, trust between students and nurses, trust of teachers in nurses, and strong collaboration between schools and public health units are key drivers of high coverage. Qualitative studies of parents provide further insights into this trust mechanism, showing that parental acceptance of HPV vaccination is strongly influenced by its inclusion in the national immunization program rather than detailed knowledge about the vaccine itself.

Parents generally trust clinicians, researchers, and government authorities to ensure vaccine safety. Their preference for school-based vaccination is also driven by convenience, as it eliminates the need for appointments, avoids disruption to work, and provides peer support on vaccination days. However, awareness gaps remain, as parents tend to associate HPV vaccination primarily with cervical cancer prevention and have limited understanding of its benefits for males. All surveyed parents supported the inclusion of HPV vaccination education in schools, believing it would improve adolescent health literacy and support informed decision-making.

In recent years, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic, the program has faced new challenges. Since 2020, vaccination coverage for all vaccines has shown a declining trend. In 2023, HPV vaccination coverage among 15-year-olds was 87.6% for girls and 84.3% for boys, decreasing further in 2024 to 85.1% and 81.0%, respectively, falling short of Australia’s target of 90%. Notably, these cohorts were in Year 7 during pandemic-related lockdowns, resulting in lower initial coverage compared to older cohorts, reflecting the lasting impact of the pandemic on routine immunization services.

In the post-pandemic context, increased vaccination anxiety among students, rising vaccine hesitancy, and misconceptions linking HPV vaccination to inappropriate sexual behavior, particularly in some religious school settings, have become key barriers. Experiences indicate that school-based vaccination programs commonly face operational challenges related to consent form return and catch-up vaccination, including incomplete or incorrect forms, signatures by non-guardians, expired consent forms, delays caused by seeking verbal consent on vaccination days, and limited resources for follow-up visits. Additional challenges include student refusal, weak linkage with community-based catch-up services, and incomplete vaccination records. These findings provide valuable references for further improving program implementation in NSW.

In conclusion, the successful implementation of school-based HPV vaccination in NSW demonstrates that a well-established school vaccination infrastructure, strong cross-sector collaboration, an experienced nursing workforce, and free and accessible vaccination services together form the foundation of high coverage. This system, which was built upon decades of sustained operation, has demonstrated resilience in the face of challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Australia’s experience shows that introducing new vaccines through existing school health systems combined with continuous evidence-based optimization is an effective pathway to achieving high vaccination coverage among adolescents, offering important lessons for countries exploring school-based immunization models.


Content Editor: Tianyi Deng

Page Editor: Ruitong Li


References
[1]Ward KF, Menzies RI, Quinn HE, Campbell-Lloyd S. (2010) School-based vaccination in NSW. NSW Public Health Bulletin 21, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1071/NB10046

[2]Vujovich-Dunn, C., Wand, H., Brotherton, J.M.L. et al. Measuring school level attributable risk to support school-based HPV vaccination programs. BMC Public Health 22, 822 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13088-x

[3]Brotherton, J., Deeks, S., Campbell-Lloyd, S., et al. (2008). Interim estimates of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage in the school-based program in Australia. Communicable Diseases Intelligence Quarterly Report, 32(4), 457–461. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.504643428389985

[4]Complex intervention to promote human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake in school settings: A cluster-randomized trial https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107542

[5]School-based HPV vaccination positively impacts parents’ attitudes toward adolescent vaccination https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.051

[6]Challenges, lessons learned and results following the implementation of a human papilloma virus school vaccination program in South Australia https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00409.x.

Others

代表性地区的基本情况、接种政策及效果、宣传推动情况

(1) 成都市

 

基本情况

成都市2022年度GDP为20817.5亿元,排名全国城市第七。成都市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式成都市宫颈癌综合防控试点工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次、进口二价0-1-6三剂次、进口四价0-2-6三剂次。资助政策为国产二价疫苗(沃泽惠)免费,其它疫苗补贴600元/人,并自付20元/剂接种费。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,由学校所在地预防接种单位负责。截至2022年1月,目标人群首针接种率达90.04%[14]。

宣传推动

成都市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,覆盖相关医疗机构300余、社区300余个、和公众场所90余个。面向适龄女孩及监护人、适龄女性及全体市民开展广泛宣教,宣传材料发放至近9万名群众,讲座活动覆盖近2万名群众。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(2) 济南市

 

基本情况

济南市2022年度GDP为12027.5亿元,位列全国城市排名20。2021年,济南市出台《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点一济南市宫颈癌综合防治工作方案(2021—2025年)》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为≤14周岁且无HPV疫苗接种史的在校七年级女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策免费接种。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,安排分班级分时段前往学校所在地的预防接种单位进行接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率达
94.4%[15].

宣传推动

济南市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括采访、线上线下专题活动,载体包括网络媒体、纸媒、科普展板、宣传手册、子宫颈癌与HPV疫苗知识读本、济南HPV疫苗接种手册,宣教人群广泛涵盖全体市民,宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控等知识。

(3) 鄂尔多斯市

 

基本情况

鄂尔多斯市2022年度GDP为5613.44亿元,全国地级市第45位。2021年,鄂尔多斯市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康鄂尔多斯行动创新模式工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

2020年8月,鄂尔多斯市在准格尔旗率先开展HPV疫苗免费接种项目。目标人群为全市当年13-18岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为进口二价0-1-6三剂次,

2023年起调整为13-14岁女孩0-6二剂次。资助政策为疫苗免费,自付20元/剂接种费。组织方式为疫苗接种服务中心根据任务安排联系学校,有规划的通知适龄女孩前来完成HPV疫苗接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率接近70%[16]。

2022年8月,启动准格尔旗和达拉特旗高三女生接种四价和九价HPV疫苗的试点工作,利用暑假时间展开接种,力争在2023年年底达成90%的接种目标[17]。自鄂尔多斯之后,由政府主导的HPV疫苗惠民行动在多地等涌现。值得注意的是,近年来多主体参与到HPV疫苗支持项目,如慈善总会、医院、妇联等为主体单位牵头组织开展了一些公益活动。

宣传推动

鄂尔多斯市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,宣教人群广泛涵盖在校女孩及监护人,适龄女性及全体市民。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(4) 西安市

 

基本情况

西安市2022年度GDP为11486.51亿元,排名全国第22位。2021年,西安市出台了《西安市健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点宫颈癌综合防治工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为全市年龄满13周岁(初中)在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次,进口二价0-1-6三剂次,进口四价和进口九价0-2-6三剂次。接种政策为自愿自费。各区(县)合理设立HPV疫苗专项疫苗接种门诊承担接种任务,并及时将接种信息统一录入儿童免疫规划信息平台。

宣传推动

西安市出台了《西安市宫颈癌综合防治宣传方案》(市健办发〔2022〕12号)。通过媒体宣传、社区活动、义诊等形式,宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信公众号、报纸等载体普及宫颈癌防治相关知识。

(5) 西藏自治区

 

基本情况

西藏自治区2022年度GDP为2132.64亿元,经济总量整体规模相对其他省份较小,人均GDP处于全国中等偏下水平。2022年出台《西藏自治区妇女“两癌”综合防治工作实施方案》等系列政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策为免费。由学校组织,接种者在商定接种时间携带个人身份证明材料与法定监护人一同前往定点接种单位接种。

宣传推动

充分利用网络、电视、广播、报刊等媒介,以群众喜闻乐见的宣传方式,对适龄在校女生HPV疫苗接种工作的意义及内容进行广泛宣传。

近年来各地HPV疫苗惠民项目信息

“疾病负担”指标解读

疾病负担(burden of disease, BOD)是指疾病造成的失能(伤残)、生活质量下降和过早死亡对健康和社会造成的总损失,包括疾病的流行病学负担和经济负担两个方面。

 

在疾病的流行病学方面,衡量疾病负担的常用指标包括传统指标和综合指标。

 

传统指标

传统疾病负担的衡量指标包括:用于描述和反映健康状况与水平的常规指标,如死亡人数、伤残人数和患病人数等绝对数指标;以及用来比较不同特征人群疾病分布差异的指标,如发病率、伤残率、患病率、死亡率、门诊和住院率等相对数指标。

 

上述传统疾病负担的衡量指标基本上只考虑了人口的生存数量,而忽略了生存质量,不够全面;但优势在于资料相对计算方便,结果直观,可用于各种疾病的一般性描述。

 

综合指标

疾病负担不等同于死亡人数,综合指标弥补了传统指标的单一性,且可以让各种不同疾病造成的负担之间相互比较。

 

潜在寿命损失年(YPLL):通过疾病造成的寿命损失来估计疾病负担的大小。但忽略了疾病造成的失能对生存质量的影响。

 

伤残调整寿命年(DALYs):将死亡和失能相结合,用一个指标来描述疾病的这两方面的负担。它包括因早死造成健康生命年的损失(YLL)和因伤残造成健康生命年的损失(YLD),即DALY=YLL+YLD。目前,DALY是国内外一致公认的最具代表性、运用最多的疾病负担评价指标。

 

健康期望寿命(HALE):指具有良好健康状态的生命年以及个体在比较舒适的状态下生活的平均预期时间,综合考虑生命的质量和数量两方面。

 

 

随着疾病负担研究的深入,其测量范围从流行病学负担扩大到经济负担。

 

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病所消耗的经济资源。

详细见:疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.

什么是“年龄标化”?

在流行病学研究中,年龄是多种疾病的危险因素。以发病率为例,该指标反映了一定时期内,特定人群中癌症新发病例的情况。由于年龄是癌症发生的一个重要影响因素,年龄越大,发病率就越高。

 

如果两个国家的人群年龄结构相差很大,例如A市老年人口比例更大,B市年轻人口占比更高,直接比较两地癌症发病率的高低,我们不能确定发病率较高的市,是因为年龄构成不同还是因为其他影响因素(如饮食习惯、环境等)所导致。因此,需要用“年龄标化”的统计学方法,进一步处理数据,排除年龄影响因素的干扰,再来比较两地的发病率数据。

 

以发病率为例,即把原始数据套到一个“标准年龄结构人群里”,计算出”年龄标化发病率“,这样人群结构不同的A市和B市,就能在同一个指标尺度下进行“发病率”比较。年龄标化通常有“中标率”,即我国各地基于某一年份的中国人口年龄结构构成作为标准计算,国内不同地区的疾病数据比较采用的是“中标率”;另一种是“世标率”,即用世界标准人口构成机型标化计算,适用于国与国之间的指标比较。

 

同样地,以死亡率为例,应特别注意各之间地人口构成的差异。用标准化死亡率进行比较才能得出正确结论。如甲、乙两地在未标化前的肺癌死亡率相同,但实际上乙地人群的肺癌死亡率要明显地高于甲地,其原因在于甲地男性老年人口居多,而肺癌的死亡率又与年龄和性别有关,所以用未标化率进行比较时,就会得出甲乙两地肺癌死亡率相同的错误结论。

 

参考资料:

 

张科宏教授:年龄标化的患病率 – 丁香公开课 (dxy.cn)

科学网—癌症(粗)发病率与标化发病率的区别 – 杨雷的博文 (sciencenet.cn)

WHO年龄标化死亡率定义及计算方法

沈洪兵,齐秀英. 流行病学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2015.

疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病的费用。通过计算疾病的经济负担,可以从经济层面上研究或比较不同疾病对人群健康的影响。

总疾病经济负担包括直接疾病经济负担、间接疾病经济负担和无形疾病经济负担。

直接经济负担:指直接用于预防和治疗疾病的总费用,包括直接医疗经济负担和直接非医疗经济负担两部分。直接医疗经济负担是指在医药保健部门购买卫生服务的花费,主要包括门诊费(如挂号费、检查费、处置费、诊断费、急救费等)、住院费(如手术费、治疗费等)和药费等。直接非医疗经济负担包括和疾病有关的营养费、交通费、住宿费、膳食费、陪护费和财产损失等。

间接经济负担:指由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人和社会带来的有效劳动力损失而导致的经济损失。具体包括:劳动工作时间损失、个人工作能力和效率降低造成的损失、陪护病人时损失的劳动工作时间、精神损失等。

无形经济负担:指患者及亲友因疾病在心理、精神和生活上遭受的痛苦、悲哀、不便等生活质量下降而产生的无形损失。

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.