NIP Country Case Series | Australia Experience of HPV Vaccination Program Implementation

Australia pioneered a national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program in 2007, recognized globally as an exemplary case of HPV vaccination implementation. After more than a decade of implementation, Australia has achieved remarkable results and is poised to become the first country in the world to eliminate cervical cancer[1]. This article summarizes the implementation experience of Australia’s HPV vaccination program to provide reference for other countries and regions.

Policy Background and Development History

In 2006, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) of Australia approved the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil®) for females aged 9-26. In 2007, the Australian government swiftly incorporated the HPV vaccine into the National Immunisation Program (NIP), providing free three-dose quadrivalent vaccination for girls aged 12-13. As scientific evidence accumulated, Australia continuously adjusted its vaccination protocol.

  • 2007 year: HPV vaccine was included in the National Immunisation Program (NIP), providing free quadrivalent vaccine through schools for girls aged 12-13, using a three-dose schedule (0, 2, 6 months).During the same period, Australia launched two catch-up programs: one targeting female students aged 13-17 in schools, and another implemented from July 2007 to December 2009 through general practitioners for adult women aged 18-26 [2]. Each state adopted different approaches based on their circumstances, implementing phased rollouts for female students in different grades [3]. For example, in Victoria, Australia’s second most populous state, the secondary school HPV vaccination program began on April 16, 2007. In 2007, free vaccination was provided to female students in Grade 7 (ages 12-13) and Grades 10-12 (ages 15-18). In 2008, free vaccination was provided to the remaining two catch-up groups of female students (who were 13-14 and 14-15 years old respectively in 2007) [2].
  • 2013 year: Vaccination coverage was expanded to include boys aged 12-13, making Australia one of the first countries in the world to implement gender-neutral HPV vaccination[4].
  • 2018 year: The quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil®) was replaced with the nonvalent vaccine (Gardasil®9), and the vaccination schedule for adolescents aged 12-13 (both female and male) was reduced from three doses to two doses, with at least 6 months between doses for those under 15 years of age. Simultaneously, free catch-up vaccination with two doses was provided for individuals up to 19 years old. Individuals aged 15 and above still required three doses, as did immunocompromised individuals regardless of age [5].
  • 2023 year: The routine two-dose HPV vaccination schedule for adolescents aged 12 to 13 was changed to a single-dose schedule using the same Gardasil®9 vaccine; simultaneously, the catch-up program upper age limit was extended from 19 to 25 years. Immunocompromised individuals still require three doses[6].

Table 1 Timeline of Australia’s HPV Vaccination Strategy

Effectiveness and Impact

Vaccination Coverage Rates Remain among the Highest Globally

According to data released by the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS) in Australia, as of 2020, 80.5% of girls and 76.5% of boys had completed the two-dose HPV vaccination series before the age of 15. This coverage rate is much higher than that in most countries that have implemented the program. With the shift to a single-dose schedule in 2023, the full – course vaccination rate further increased. In 2023, 84.2% of girls and 81.8% of boys received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine before the age of 15[7].

Substantial Reduction in Disease Burden

Numerous studies have demonstrated the remarkable effectiveness of Australia’s HPV vaccination program. A repeat cross-sectional study showed that prevalence of cervical HPV types targeted by the quadrivalent vaccine has declined by 92% among 18- to 35-year-old Australian women 9 years following implementation of vaccination[8]. 2011, five years after HPV vaccines were included in the immunization program, the proportion of women under 21 diagnosed with genital warts dropped dramatically, from 11.5% in 2007 to 0.85% in 2011 [9]. In Victoria, five years after the implementation of the HPV vaccination program, the incidence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) among women aged 20-23 decreased by 48% [10]. Reports predict that Australia’s cervical cancer incidence rate is expected to drop to <4 per 100,000 by 2035, achieving the WHO-set goal of “cervical cancer elimination” [11]. These achievements highlight the public health value of HPV vaccination programs and their herd immunity effects.

Analysis of Success Factors

Strong Policy and Financial Support

The Australian federal government has provided firm policy and financial support for the HPV vaccine program. In 2023, the Australian government announced an investment of 48.2 million Australian dollars over the next 4 years to improve accessibility to cervical cancer screening and follow-up services, and to enhance data acquisition on population immunization [12]. Adequate financial support effectively eliminates economic barriers to program advancement and promotes widespread vaccination.

Evidence-based Policy Adjustments

Australia continuously adjusts its vaccination strategies based on the latest scientific evidence. The government respects and adopts the scientific advice provided by professional advisory bodies, such as the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). It aligns with the recommendations of international organizations, mainly the World Health Organization’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE). The government regularly evaluates international research data and local implementation experiences, promptly incorporating the latest research findings, such as evidence of the effectiveness of the single-dose regimen. This emphasis on evidence-based decision-making ensures the scientific integrity of Australia’s vaccination policies[5].

Multilevel Service System

To ensure comprehensive coverage, Australia has established a multilevel service system. School-based vaccination is the main route, covering most adolescents; general practitioner clinics and community pharmacies can provide services for those who were unable to be vaccinated at school; and Aboriginal health services can offer culturally appropriate services for the Indigenous population. These services include developing culturally sensitive promotional materials, promoting the vaccination program through Indigenous community leaders, and providing mobile vaccination services in remote areas. This multilevel system ensures vaccine accessibility through different channels, reflecting the flexibility and inclusiveness of Australia’s HPV vaccination program [5,11].

School-based vaccination ensures coverage of priority target populations

Australia’s tradition of providing voluntary school-based vaccination for adolescents began in the 1970s, incorporating vaccination into routine school health services, with professional nurses administering vaccines and requiring parental informed consent. The HPV school-based vaccination program has received strong support from parents and communities because vaccination is convenient, families do not need to pay fees, and it saves parents’ energy and time; on vaccination days, peer support forms among adolescents [13]. Various social levels also provide support for school vaccination. For example, Australian universities have established specialized courses for secondary school teachers to enhance their knowledge and understanding of HPV vaccines, helping to promote HPV immunization [14].

Effective Public Education and Communication

In response to vaccine hesitancy and safety concerns, Australia has adopted a scientific and transparent communication strategy, including: the government publishing HPV vaccination recommendation updates on official websites and providing publicly accessible HPV vaccine Q&A materials [15, 16], providing parents and adolescents with evidence-based scientific information materials, emphasizing the key role of HPV vaccines in eliminating cervical cancer. Health departments also provide professional HPV vaccine immunization manuals for healthcare workers, detailing national immunization program policies, vaccination recommendations for different risk groups, and evidence-based rationales [6, 17]. Health departments maintain open media communication channels, promptly responding to media inquiries about vaccine safety, and maintaining transparent information communication. Additionally, non-governmental organizations, industry associations, and others actively participate in HPV vaccine science popularization and public communication [18].

Comprehensive Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism

Since Australia’s childhood vaccine registration system cannot cover adolescent vaccines, to promote effective implementation of the HPV vaccination program, Australia established the National Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Program Register (NHVPR) through legislation to assist in monitoring vaccination coverage rates. Each state has varying degrees of immunization safety monitoring, while comprehensive data system connectivity enables the development of risk management strategies, effective and rapid handling of adverse events, and maintains public and healthcare worker confidence in vaccines [19]. Australia also evaluates vaccine implementation and effectiveness by integrating cervical cancer screening system data and HPV epidemiological survey data, providing scientific evidence for policy adjustments.

Implications for Other Countries

Australia’s successful experience provides valuable insights for other countries and regions. First, the firm commitment and continuous financial support from the government are crucial; second, a multilevel service system can ensure comprehensive coverage and the school-based vaccination model is an effective way to increase coverage rates; in addition, evidence – based communication and education are key to addressing vaccine hesitancy; finally, a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation system can promote the continuous improvement of the program. 

The successful implementation and remarkable effectiveness of Australia’s HPV vaccination program demonstrate the power of comprehensive and systematic public health interventions. Australia is expected to be the first to eliminate cervical cancer within the next decade, and its implementation model and experience are worthy of global reference, offering a practical path for countries around the world to eliminate the disease burden associated with HPV.

Reference

[1] Hall M.T., Simms K.T., Lew J.B., et al. The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in australia: A modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2019, 4(1): e19-e27.

[2] Brotherton J.M., Fridman M., May C.L., et al. Early effect of the hpv vaccination programme on cervical abnormalities in victoria, australia: An ecological study. Lancet. 2011, 377(9783): 2085-2092.

[3] Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. (n.d.). Department of Health and Aged Care | Interim estimates of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage in the school-based program in Australia. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cda-cdi3204i.htm

[4] Smith M.A., Canfell K. Incremental benefits of male hpv vaccination: Accounting for inequality in population uptake. PLoS One. 2014, 9(8): e101048.

[5] Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Development of a national cervical cancer elimination strategy technical paper. 2022.

[6] Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), Australian immunisation handbook, C.A.G.D.o. Health, Editor. 2023.

[7] Hull B., Hendry A., Macartney K., et al., Annual immunisation coverage report 2023, in Sydney: National Centre For Immunisation Research and Surveillance. 2024.

[8] Machalek D.A., Garland S.M., Brotherton J.M.L., et al. Very low prevalence of vaccine human papillomavirus types among 18- to 35-year old australian women 9 years following implementation of vaccination. J Infect Dis. 2018, 217(10): 1590-1600.

[9] Ali H., Donovan B., Wand H., et al. Genital warts in young australians five years into national human papillomavirus vaccination programme: National surveillance data. Bmj. 2013, 346: f2032.

[10] Garland S.M., Kjaer S.K., Muñoz N., et al. Impact and effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: A systematic review of 10 years of real-world experience. Clin Infect Dis. 2016, 63(4): 519-527.

[11] Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer. (2023). NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE ELIMINATION OF CERVICAL CANCER IN AUSTRALIA. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-11/national-strategy-for-the-elimination-of-cervical-cancer-in-australia.pdf

[12] Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing. (2023, November 17). Making history by eliminating cervical cancer in Australia and our region. https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-ged-kearney-mp/media/making-history-by-eliminating-cervical-cancer-in-australia-and-our-region

[13]Davies, C., Stoney, T., Hutton, H., Parrella, A., Kang, M., Macartney, K., Leask, J., McCaffery, K., Zimet, G., Brotherton, J. M., Marshall, H. S., & Skinner, S. R. (2021). School-based HPV vaccination positively impacts parents’ attitudes toward adolescent vaccination. Vaccine, 39(30), 4190–4198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.051

[14] Co-designing HPV vaccination professional development for teachers and school staff: A Collaborative Approach with Key Stakeholders in Health and Education. (2025, July 1). The University of Sydney. https://www.sydney.edu.au/infectious-diseases-institute/news-and-events/news/2025/07/01/co-designing-hpv-vaccination-professional-development-for-teachers.html

[15] NCIRS. (2018b). Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines for Australians | NCIRS Fact sheet: April 2018. In NCIRS Fact Sheet. https://www.ncirs.org.au/sites/default/files/2018-12/HPV%20Factsheet_2018%20Aug%20Update_final%20for%20web.pdf

[16] NCIRS. (2018a). HPV vaccine – FAQ. In NCIRS Fact Sheet. https://www.ncirs.org.au/sites/default/files/2018-12/HPV%20Frequently%20Asked%20Questions_2018%20Update_Final%20for%20web.pdf

[17] Leask J., Kinnersley P., Jackson C., et al. Communicating with parents about vaccination: A framework for health professionals. BMC Pediatr. 2012, 12: 154.

[18] Support, G. C. (2025, July 23). School education. ACCF. https://accf.org.au/school-education/

[19] Garland, S. M. (2014). The Australian experience with the human papillomavirus vaccine. Clinical Therapeutics, 36(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.12.005

Others

代表性地区的基本情况、接种政策及效果、宣传推动情况

(1) 成都市

 

基本情况

成都市2022年度GDP为20817.5亿元,排名全国城市第七。成都市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式成都市宫颈癌综合防控试点工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次、进口二价0-1-6三剂次、进口四价0-2-6三剂次。资助政策为国产二价疫苗(沃泽惠)免费,其它疫苗补贴600元/人,并自付20元/剂接种费。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,由学校所在地预防接种单位负责。截至2022年1月,目标人群首针接种率达90.04%[14]。

宣传推动

成都市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,覆盖相关医疗机构300余、社区300余个、和公众场所90余个。面向适龄女孩及监护人、适龄女性及全体市民开展广泛宣教,宣传材料发放至近9万名群众,讲座活动覆盖近2万名群众。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(2) 济南市

 

基本情况

济南市2022年度GDP为12027.5亿元,位列全国城市排名20。2021年,济南市出台《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点一济南市宫颈癌综合防治工作方案(2021—2025年)》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为≤14周岁且无HPV疫苗接种史的在校七年级女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策免费接种。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,安排分班级分时段前往学校所在地的预防接种单位进行接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率达
94.4%[15].

宣传推动

济南市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括采访、线上线下专题活动,载体包括网络媒体、纸媒、科普展板、宣传手册、子宫颈癌与HPV疫苗知识读本、济南HPV疫苗接种手册,宣教人群广泛涵盖全体市民,宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控等知识。

(3) 鄂尔多斯市

 

基本情况

鄂尔多斯市2022年度GDP为5613.44亿元,全国地级市第45位。2021年,鄂尔多斯市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康鄂尔多斯行动创新模式工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

2020年8月,鄂尔多斯市在准格尔旗率先开展HPV疫苗免费接种项目。目标人群为全市当年13-18岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为进口二价0-1-6三剂次,

2023年起调整为13-14岁女孩0-6二剂次。资助政策为疫苗免费,自付20元/剂接种费。组织方式为疫苗接种服务中心根据任务安排联系学校,有规划的通知适龄女孩前来完成HPV疫苗接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率接近70%[16]。

2022年8月,启动准格尔旗和达拉特旗高三女生接种四价和九价HPV疫苗的试点工作,利用暑假时间展开接种,力争在2023年年底达成90%的接种目标[17]。自鄂尔多斯之后,由政府主导的HPV疫苗惠民行动在多地等涌现。值得注意的是,近年来多主体参与到HPV疫苗支持项目,如慈善总会、医院、妇联等为主体单位牵头组织开展了一些公益活动。

宣传推动

鄂尔多斯市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,宣教人群广泛涵盖在校女孩及监护人,适龄女性及全体市民。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(4) 西安市

 

基本情况

西安市2022年度GDP为11486.51亿元,排名全国第22位。2021年,西安市出台了《西安市健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点宫颈癌综合防治工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为全市年龄满13周岁(初中)在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次,进口二价0-1-6三剂次,进口四价和进口九价0-2-6三剂次。接种政策为自愿自费。各区(县)合理设立HPV疫苗专项疫苗接种门诊承担接种任务,并及时将接种信息统一录入儿童免疫规划信息平台。

宣传推动

西安市出台了《西安市宫颈癌综合防治宣传方案》(市健办发〔2022〕12号)。通过媒体宣传、社区活动、义诊等形式,宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信公众号、报纸等载体普及宫颈癌防治相关知识。

(5) 西藏自治区

 

基本情况

西藏自治区2022年度GDP为2132.64亿元,经济总量整体规模相对其他省份较小,人均GDP处于全国中等偏下水平。2022年出台《西藏自治区妇女“两癌”综合防治工作实施方案》等系列政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策为免费。由学校组织,接种者在商定接种时间携带个人身份证明材料与法定监护人一同前往定点接种单位接种。

宣传推动

充分利用网络、电视、广播、报刊等媒介,以群众喜闻乐见的宣传方式,对适龄在校女生HPV疫苗接种工作的意义及内容进行广泛宣传。

近年来各地HPV疫苗惠民项目信息

“疾病负担”指标解读

疾病负担(burden of disease, BOD)是指疾病造成的失能(伤残)、生活质量下降和过早死亡对健康和社会造成的总损失,包括疾病的流行病学负担和经济负担两个方面。

 

在疾病的流行病学方面,衡量疾病负担的常用指标包括传统指标和综合指标。

 

传统指标

传统疾病负担的衡量指标包括:用于描述和反映健康状况与水平的常规指标,如死亡人数、伤残人数和患病人数等绝对数指标;以及用来比较不同特征人群疾病分布差异的指标,如发病率、伤残率、患病率、死亡率、门诊和住院率等相对数指标。

 

上述传统疾病负担的衡量指标基本上只考虑了人口的生存数量,而忽略了生存质量,不够全面;但优势在于资料相对计算方便,结果直观,可用于各种疾病的一般性描述。

 

综合指标

疾病负担不等同于死亡人数,综合指标弥补了传统指标的单一性,且可以让各种不同疾病造成的负担之间相互比较。

 

潜在寿命损失年(YPLL):通过疾病造成的寿命损失来估计疾病负担的大小。但忽略了疾病造成的失能对生存质量的影响。

 

伤残调整寿命年(DALYs):将死亡和失能相结合,用一个指标来描述疾病的这两方面的负担。它包括因早死造成健康生命年的损失(YLL)和因伤残造成健康生命年的损失(YLD),即DALY=YLL+YLD。目前,DALY是国内外一致公认的最具代表性、运用最多的疾病负担评价指标。

 

健康期望寿命(HALE):指具有良好健康状态的生命年以及个体在比较舒适的状态下生活的平均预期时间,综合考虑生命的质量和数量两方面。

 

 

随着疾病负担研究的深入,其测量范围从流行病学负担扩大到经济负担。

 

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病所消耗的经济资源。

详细见:疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.

什么是“年龄标化”?

在流行病学研究中,年龄是多种疾病的危险因素。以发病率为例,该指标反映了一定时期内,特定人群中癌症新发病例的情况。由于年龄是癌症发生的一个重要影响因素,年龄越大,发病率就越高。

 

如果两个国家的人群年龄结构相差很大,例如A市老年人口比例更大,B市年轻人口占比更高,直接比较两地癌症发病率的高低,我们不能确定发病率较高的市,是因为年龄构成不同还是因为其他影响因素(如饮食习惯、环境等)所导致。因此,需要用“年龄标化”的统计学方法,进一步处理数据,排除年龄影响因素的干扰,再来比较两地的发病率数据。

 

以发病率为例,即把原始数据套到一个“标准年龄结构人群里”,计算出”年龄标化发病率“,这样人群结构不同的A市和B市,就能在同一个指标尺度下进行“发病率”比较。年龄标化通常有“中标率”,即我国各地基于某一年份的中国人口年龄结构构成作为标准计算,国内不同地区的疾病数据比较采用的是“中标率”;另一种是“世标率”,即用世界标准人口构成机型标化计算,适用于国与国之间的指标比较。

 

同样地,以死亡率为例,应特别注意各之间地人口构成的差异。用标准化死亡率进行比较才能得出正确结论。如甲、乙两地在未标化前的肺癌死亡率相同,但实际上乙地人群的肺癌死亡率要明显地高于甲地,其原因在于甲地男性老年人口居多,而肺癌的死亡率又与年龄和性别有关,所以用未标化率进行比较时,就会得出甲乙两地肺癌死亡率相同的错误结论。

 

参考资料:

 

张科宏教授:年龄标化的患病率 – 丁香公开课 (dxy.cn)

科学网—癌症(粗)发病率与标化发病率的区别 – 杨雷的博文 (sciencenet.cn)

WHO年龄标化死亡率定义及计算方法

沈洪兵,齐秀英. 流行病学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2015.

疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病的费用。通过计算疾病的经济负担,可以从经济层面上研究或比较不同疾病对人群健康的影响。

总疾病经济负担包括直接疾病经济负担、间接疾病经济负担和无形疾病经济负担。

直接经济负担:指直接用于预防和治疗疾病的总费用,包括直接医疗经济负担和直接非医疗经济负担两部分。直接医疗经济负担是指在医药保健部门购买卫生服务的花费,主要包括门诊费(如挂号费、检查费、处置费、诊断费、急救费等)、住院费(如手术费、治疗费等)和药费等。直接非医疗经济负担包括和疾病有关的营养费、交通费、住宿费、膳食费、陪护费和财产损失等。

间接经济负担:指由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人和社会带来的有效劳动力损失而导致的经济损失。具体包括:劳动工作时间损失、个人工作能力和效率降低造成的损失、陪护病人时损失的劳动工作时间、精神损失等。

无形经济负担:指患者及亲友因疾病在心理、精神和生活上遭受的痛苦、悲哀、不便等生活质量下降而产生的无形损失。

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.