Country Case: Implementation Experience of the HPV Vaccine School-basedImmunization Program in Singapore

Singapore has implemented a nationwide school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program since 2019, aiming to significantly increase vaccination coverage and reduce the disease burden of cervical cancer through an institutionalized, systematic vaccination strategy. The “health-education-society” collaborative model it has established holds significant reference value for China. This article summarizes Singapore’s experience in implementing a school-based program for HPV vaccination, drawing on publicly available literature published by members of the Health Promotion Board and expert insights shared at VaxLab’s online technical workshop.

Background of the School-Based Vaccination Program

Singapore established its School Health Services in 1921, boasting a long history and a well-established system. Prior to the introduction of the HPV vaccine school immunization program, school-based vaccination services were primarily conducted in primary schools. These services mainly provided catch-up vaccinations for measles, diphtheria, and polio vaccines, as well as tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis (Tdap) booster shots for 10- to 11-year-old Primary five students.

In November 2010, the HPV vaccine was formally incorporated into Singapore’s National Childhood Immunisation Programme (NCIP). Its coverage was further expanded to include adults in November 2017. In 2019, Singapore launched HPV vaccination in schools, formally extending the school-based immunization service to the secondary school level.

According to 2016 estimates, HPV vaccine coverage among 26 years old was only about 25%. Key reasons include insufficient awareness, inconvenience due to multiple doses and high cost of vaccination. For instance, during the early stages of HPV vaccine introduction into the National Immunization Program, the vaccination cost was relatively high, second only to pneumococcal vaccines. At government polyclinics, a single dose costs approximately S$120, while the full 2-3 dose course costs around S$240-360. Even with the option to use MediSave, this represented a significant financial burden for some families.

Policy makers believe that implementing school-based immunization programs can help overcome these barriers. First, leveraging the long-established and well-established school-based vaccination system would facilitate targeted information delivery to students and parents. Second, administering vaccinations on school premises would enhance convenience for recipients. Third, vaccines administered through school programs would be fully subsidized by the government, reducing the financial burden on families.

School Immunization Program: Target Population and Catch-Up Schedule

Since 2019, Singapore has implemented a nationwide school-based HPV vaccination program. Based on evidence from cost-effectiveness studies, Singapore selected the bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) as the preferred vaccine for its school immunization program. The school-based HPV vaccination targets female students entering Secondary 1 (12-13 years old) as the core cohort, following a two-dose schedule (0, 6-12 months) with a 12-month interval between doses.

Selecting first-year Secondary schoolgirls (aged 12-13) as the target vaccination group primarily considered the following three core factors: 1) HPV is primarily transmitted through sexual activity. Vaccination is most effective before exposure to infection. Vaccinating at younger ages would inevitably require discussing sensitive topics, causing discomfort for parents; 2) First-year secondary students are not required to take major national examinations, reducing parental vaccine hesitancy and interference with vaccination scheduling. Additionally, the two-dose vaccination schedule minimally impacts school timetables, allowing vaccination teams to administer doses to two grade levels during each school visit. Currently, students who miss vaccination at school can schedule appointments at the Student Health Center under the Health Promotion Board.

In 2019, all female students enrolled in Secondary 1 through 5 became eligible for the vaccine through a one-time catch-up program. A phased catch-up mechanism will be implemented, prioritizing coverage for those in Secondary Year 3 to 5 who were nearing graduation. Lower-secondary students were progressively vaccinated over the following two years to achieve full coverage across all age groups. Girls aged 15 and under received a two-dose regimen, while those over 15 received a three-dose regimen.

Cross-sectoral Collaboration, Service Provision, and End-To-End Management

The Health Promotion Board (HPB), a statutory board under Singapore’s Ministry of Health, administers the School Health Service and serves as the primary provider for the school HPV immunization program. HPV vaccination is offered on a voluntary basis, with the government covering the full cost.

The Health Promotion Board of Singapore is responsible for providing timely updates to schools under the Ministry of Education regarding the HPV vaccination program, its coverage, and implementation progress, including consent procedures and confidentiality measures. The Ministry of Education provides the Health Promotion Board with registration data for students in secondary schools. The Health Promotion Board also briefs principals and relevant school administrators to familiarize them with the workflow. Detailed vaccination letters are sent to each school principal. On the school side, teachers and relevant staff support program operations, including information dissemination and scheduling student appointments—determining when to bring which class to the health screening and vaccination site, and so forth.

The school health service team typically visits schools once every year. While administering the first dose of HPV vaccine to new Secondary 1 girls, they can also provide the second dose to students who have advance to Secondary 2. Vaccination procedures follow strict standardized protocols, including pre-vaccination health assessments, standardized administration techniques, on-site medical observation, and a mandatory 15-minute post-vaccination monitoring period. A mechanism for reporting and rapidly addressing adverse events is established.

As part of the implementation, the government also contracted private providers to assist with vaccination procedures for target and catch-up groups. These providers were also responsible for offering follow-up vaccination services to students deemed medically ineligible for vaccination on school-based vaccination days, as well as to catch-up group students who were about to graduate and leave school before completing their three-dose regimen. For women aged 18-26 who had already left school, targeted outreach via text messages guided them to book appointments through the government-developed Health Appointment System (HAS), establishing a seamless continuity of immunization services both on and off campus. The Health Promotion Board also conducted multiple meetings and training sessions for providers, including simulations of common scenarios encountered during vaccinations and corresponding response measures.

The project leverages the School Health Service’s Clinical Management System for end-to-end digital management, that includes an online Child Consent Portal (CCP) that integrates electronic informed consent, information push notifications, and status inquiry functions. After logging into the CCP, parents can enter their child’s medical history, current medications, known allergies, and electronically sign the HPV vaccination consent form. This consent covers all doses until the vaccination series is completed. Should parents decline vaccination, the system provides a dedicated section for them to state their reasons for refusal.

One week prior to school vaccinations, parents who have not completed the online form will receive reminders from the school and healthcare team. The online CCP information is transmitted to the Clinical Management System via the government’s dedicated encrypted network.

In project oversight, the Health Promotion Board established a dedicated HPV Control Room to monitor nationwide on-site vaccination efforts and vaccination rates. Following daily school visits, all nursing team managers participated in post-action assessment meetings. These sessions involved updating on-site vaccination statistics and troubleshooting practical challenges encountered. The Oversight Committee also conducted on-site visits to vaccination sites to supervise immunization procedures and identify potential oversights.

Communications, Mobilization, and Health Education

Prior to and during the implementation of the school-based vaccination program, Singapore adopted a multi-channel communication strategy grounded in scientific evidence to enhance trust and awareness of the HPV vaccine. In 2018, Singapore conducted a questionnaire survey among 2,098 parents from eight primary schools and eight secondary schools. Survey results showed widespread support—63.3% of respondents favored vaccination, with only 4.4% opposing introducing the HPV vaccination program, and 32.3% remaining neutral. However, only 44.0% of respondents were aware of the vaccine, and just 14.8% of family members had ever received it. Insufficient information was cited as the primary reason parents declined to consent to vaccination.

Based on these survey findings, the Health Promotion Board collaborated with the Singapore Cancer Society to launch a large-scale online platform campaign targeting parents of adolescents aged 13 to 17 from July to September 2019. Through digital media advertising and poster campaigns, the initiative aimed to enhance public trust in the HPV vaccine and emphasize its value in reducing cervical cancer risk. Simultaneously, the government promoted the benefits and strong safety profile of the HPV vaccine through multilingual newspapers, broadcast news, and social media channels. Prior to project implementation, HPB also engaged in thorough discussions with the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore, confirming that there were no religious contraindications to HPV vaccination.

On the day of on-campus vaccination, the vaccination team nurses explained HPV infection and its link to cervical cancer to students, outlined the indications for the HPV vaccine, and discussed potential side effects and relief measures. Subsequently, licensed physicians assessed students to confirm the absence of contraindications. On-site verification of both paper and electronic versions of the informed consent form was conducted. If parents had not yet signed either version, on-site nurses contacted them by phone to obtain consent. This process also allowed for real-time clarification of parental concerns and resolution of misunderstandings. Upon parental agreement, consent could be provided via the CCP or by visiting the school to sign the paper document. Vaccination was then administered by the vaccination team. After vaccination, students remained seated in the observation area under direct supervision of the nursing team for 15 minutes to monitor for adverse reactions or side effects. Only if no abnormal reactions were observed could students return to class, along with guidance on when to seek medical attention.

The Effectiveness of HPV Program Implementation

Data review indicates that from 2018 to 2024, vaccination coverage among female Singaporean residents aged 15 (including citizens and permanent residents) rose significantly from under 30% to approximately 88%-89%.

Another study published in 2023 revealed that prior to implementing the school-based HPV immunization program, vaccination rates among women aged 18 to 26 stood at only 13.6%. Among first-year secondary school students, just 3.0% had completed the vaccination series, while vaccination rates for fourth- and fifth-grade students reached 6.2%. Following the school-based program implementation, overall vaccine coverage—including off-campus vaccination pathways—reached 90.3%–93.4%. The explicit refusal rate was only 1.5%–1.9%, indicating high societal acceptance.

During the study period, 50,695 doses of HPV vaccine administered in schools (including initial routine doses and catch-up first/second doses) were reviewed, with an adverse reaction reporting rate of 0.1% (51 cases). Reported symptoms primarily consisted of known mild reactions such as dizziness and fatigue. Only 3 students experienced syncope, all of whom underwent further medical evaluation: one case was attributed to extreme needle phobia, while the other two were determined to be unrelated to the vaccine. Among these, 37 students (including the 2 who experienced syncope) successfully completed their second-dose vaccination.

Insights and Lessons Learned

The implementation experience of Singapore’s HPV vaccine school-based immunization program demonstrates that the success of high-coverage immunization initiatives depends on the effective integration of top-level institutional design, financial safeguards, inter-agency collaboration, and a meticulous implementation system. The success of the school-based approach can be attributed to the following factors:

Insights into the needs of target vaccination populations and parents. Surveys were conducted early in the project implementation phase to assess parents’; and children’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vaccines and health-related information. Preference for vaccination site selection was also investigated. Based on the findings, multiple solutions were implemented, including launching a media campaign to boost vaccine awareness, conducting extensive outreach, producing informational brochures, and providing parents with FAQ handbooks.

Engagement of key stakeholders and establishment of robust partnerships. Collaboration with the Ministry of Education ensured the vaccination program seamlessly integrated with the school curriculum while fully accommodating national examination schedules and critical assessment timelines. Partnerships with the Singapore Cancer Society reinforced unified messaging on the vaccine’s importance, while coordination with religious groups ensured the immunization plan did not conflict with religious requirements. At the implementation level, collaboration with schools and their service operations managers ensured smooth on-site arrangements and immunization processes. Partnerships with healthcare providers enabled timely reminders and catch-up follow-ups, allowing students who missed school-based vaccinations to conveniently receive doses at community clinics nationwide.

Continuous monitoring, evaluation, and improvement of the on-campus vaccination service system. The Health Promotion Board maintains vaccine storage standards through continuous field visits, evaluations, and cold chain management oversight. It facilitates ongoing assessment and improvement of existing systems by conducting daily Activity After-Action Reviews (AARs), including: 1) Enhancing vaccine delivery timeliness to avoid prolonging students’; school hours; 2) Analyzing success factors of schools achieving 95%-100% vaccination rates for replication across other institutions. Regarding implementation, details and services are meticulously executed, including: 1) Sending reminder letters to parents one week prior to vaccination to reduce incomplete form submission rates; 2) Systematically following up with absentees by phone to invite them for alternate vaccination dates; 3) Collaborating with school parent support groups; 4) Pre-sorting consent forms before vaccination days and contacting parents with incomplete forms on-site to optimize time efficiency.

The Singapore Model provides a comprehensive implementation framework encompassing evidence-based decision-making, needs assessment, multisectoral coordination, and continuous quality improvement. For countries and regions with well-established education systems and robust primary healthcare networks, this model offers high transferability in terms of institutional embedding pathways, collaborative governance structures, and digital support systems. It provides valuable policy and practical references for accelerating HPV vaccination programs and achieving the goal of eliminating cervical cancer.


Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to Mr. Lim Soon Kok, Director of the Immunization Policy and Strategy Division, Policy and Systems Department, National Infectious Disease Agency, Ministry of Health, Singapore, for his presentation at the VaxLab online technical workshop. We also thank Gao Zhenghong, a student from the School of Public Health at Kunming Medical University, for compiling and translating the seminar minutes.


Content Editor: Zhourong Li

Proofreader: Zhangyang Pan

Page Editor : Ruitong Li


Reference:

[1] Vijayalakshmi K, Goei AHY. Improved population coverage of the human papillomavirus vaccine after implementation of a school-based vaccination programme: the Singapore experience. Singapore Med J. 2023 May;64(5):294-301. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2022053. PMID: 35546141; PMCID: PMC10219123.

Others

代表性地区的基本情况、接种政策及效果、宣传推动情况

(1) 成都市

 

基本情况

成都市2022年度GDP为20817.5亿元,排名全国城市第七。成都市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式成都市宫颈癌综合防控试点工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次、进口二价0-1-6三剂次、进口四价0-2-6三剂次。资助政策为国产二价疫苗(沃泽惠)免费,其它疫苗补贴600元/人,并自付20元/剂接种费。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,由学校所在地预防接种单位负责。截至2022年1月,目标人群首针接种率达90.04%[14]。

宣传推动

成都市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,覆盖相关医疗机构300余、社区300余个、和公众场所90余个。面向适龄女孩及监护人、适龄女性及全体市民开展广泛宣教,宣传材料发放至近9万名群众,讲座活动覆盖近2万名群众。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(2) 济南市

 

基本情况

济南市2022年度GDP为12027.5亿元,位列全国城市排名20。2021年,济南市出台《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点一济南市宫颈癌综合防治工作方案(2021—2025年)》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为≤14周岁且无HPV疫苗接种史的在校七年级女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策免费接种。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,安排分班级分时段前往学校所在地的预防接种单位进行接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率达
94.4%[15].

宣传推动

济南市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括采访、线上线下专题活动,载体包括网络媒体、纸媒、科普展板、宣传手册、子宫颈癌与HPV疫苗知识读本、济南HPV疫苗接种手册,宣教人群广泛涵盖全体市民,宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控等知识。

(3) 鄂尔多斯市

 

基本情况

鄂尔多斯市2022年度GDP为5613.44亿元,全国地级市第45位。2021年,鄂尔多斯市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康鄂尔多斯行动创新模式工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

2020年8月,鄂尔多斯市在准格尔旗率先开展HPV疫苗免费接种项目。目标人群为全市当年13-18岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为进口二价0-1-6三剂次,

2023年起调整为13-14岁女孩0-6二剂次。资助政策为疫苗免费,自付20元/剂接种费。组织方式为疫苗接种服务中心根据任务安排联系学校,有规划的通知适龄女孩前来完成HPV疫苗接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率接近70%[16]。

2022年8月,启动准格尔旗和达拉特旗高三女生接种四价和九价HPV疫苗的试点工作,利用暑假时间展开接种,力争在2023年年底达成90%的接种目标[17]。自鄂尔多斯之后,由政府主导的HPV疫苗惠民行动在多地等涌现。值得注意的是,近年来多主体参与到HPV疫苗支持项目,如慈善总会、医院、妇联等为主体单位牵头组织开展了一些公益活动。

宣传推动

鄂尔多斯市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,宣教人群广泛涵盖在校女孩及监护人,适龄女性及全体市民。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(4) 西安市

 

基本情况

西安市2022年度GDP为11486.51亿元,排名全国第22位。2021年,西安市出台了《西安市健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点宫颈癌综合防治工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为全市年龄满13周岁(初中)在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次,进口二价0-1-6三剂次,进口四价和进口九价0-2-6三剂次。接种政策为自愿自费。各区(县)合理设立HPV疫苗专项疫苗接种门诊承担接种任务,并及时将接种信息统一录入儿童免疫规划信息平台。

宣传推动

西安市出台了《西安市宫颈癌综合防治宣传方案》(市健办发〔2022〕12号)。通过媒体宣传、社区活动、义诊等形式,宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信公众号、报纸等载体普及宫颈癌防治相关知识。

(5) 西藏自治区

 

基本情况

西藏自治区2022年度GDP为2132.64亿元,经济总量整体规模相对其他省份较小,人均GDP处于全国中等偏下水平。2022年出台《西藏自治区妇女“两癌”综合防治工作实施方案》等系列政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策为免费。由学校组织,接种者在商定接种时间携带个人身份证明材料与法定监护人一同前往定点接种单位接种。

宣传推动

充分利用网络、电视、广播、报刊等媒介,以群众喜闻乐见的宣传方式,对适龄在校女生HPV疫苗接种工作的意义及内容进行广泛宣传。

近年来各地HPV疫苗惠民项目信息

“疾病负担”指标解读

疾病负担(burden of disease, BOD)是指疾病造成的失能(伤残)、生活质量下降和过早死亡对健康和社会造成的总损失,包括疾病的流行病学负担和经济负担两个方面。

 

在疾病的流行病学方面,衡量疾病负担的常用指标包括传统指标和综合指标。

 

传统指标

传统疾病负担的衡量指标包括:用于描述和反映健康状况与水平的常规指标,如死亡人数、伤残人数和患病人数等绝对数指标;以及用来比较不同特征人群疾病分布差异的指标,如发病率、伤残率、患病率、死亡率、门诊和住院率等相对数指标。

 

上述传统疾病负担的衡量指标基本上只考虑了人口的生存数量,而忽略了生存质量,不够全面;但优势在于资料相对计算方便,结果直观,可用于各种疾病的一般性描述。

 

综合指标

疾病负担不等同于死亡人数,综合指标弥补了传统指标的单一性,且可以让各种不同疾病造成的负担之间相互比较。

 

潜在寿命损失年(YPLL):通过疾病造成的寿命损失来估计疾病负担的大小。但忽略了疾病造成的失能对生存质量的影响。

 

伤残调整寿命年(DALYs):将死亡和失能相结合,用一个指标来描述疾病的这两方面的负担。它包括因早死造成健康生命年的损失(YLL)和因伤残造成健康生命年的损失(YLD),即DALY=YLL+YLD。目前,DALY是国内外一致公认的最具代表性、运用最多的疾病负担评价指标。

 

健康期望寿命(HALE):指具有良好健康状态的生命年以及个体在比较舒适的状态下生活的平均预期时间,综合考虑生命的质量和数量两方面。

 

 

随着疾病负担研究的深入,其测量范围从流行病学负担扩大到经济负担。

 

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病所消耗的经济资源。

详细见:疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.

什么是“年龄标化”?

在流行病学研究中,年龄是多种疾病的危险因素。以发病率为例,该指标反映了一定时期内,特定人群中癌症新发病例的情况。由于年龄是癌症发生的一个重要影响因素,年龄越大,发病率就越高。

 

如果两个国家的人群年龄结构相差很大,例如A市老年人口比例更大,B市年轻人口占比更高,直接比较两地癌症发病率的高低,我们不能确定发病率较高的市,是因为年龄构成不同还是因为其他影响因素(如饮食习惯、环境等)所导致。因此,需要用“年龄标化”的统计学方法,进一步处理数据,排除年龄影响因素的干扰,再来比较两地的发病率数据。

 

以发病率为例,即把原始数据套到一个“标准年龄结构人群里”,计算出”年龄标化发病率“,这样人群结构不同的A市和B市,就能在同一个指标尺度下进行“发病率”比较。年龄标化通常有“中标率”,即我国各地基于某一年份的中国人口年龄结构构成作为标准计算,国内不同地区的疾病数据比较采用的是“中标率”;另一种是“世标率”,即用世界标准人口构成机型标化计算,适用于国与国之间的指标比较。

 

同样地,以死亡率为例,应特别注意各之间地人口构成的差异。用标准化死亡率进行比较才能得出正确结论。如甲、乙两地在未标化前的肺癌死亡率相同,但实际上乙地人群的肺癌死亡率要明显地高于甲地,其原因在于甲地男性老年人口居多,而肺癌的死亡率又与年龄和性别有关,所以用未标化率进行比较时,就会得出甲乙两地肺癌死亡率相同的错误结论。

 

参考资料:

 

张科宏教授:年龄标化的患病率 – 丁香公开课 (dxy.cn)

科学网—癌症(粗)发病率与标化发病率的区别 – 杨雷的博文 (sciencenet.cn)

WHO年龄标化死亡率定义及计算方法

沈洪兵,齐秀英. 流行病学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2015.

疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病的费用。通过计算疾病的经济负担,可以从经济层面上研究或比较不同疾病对人群健康的影响。

总疾病经济负担包括直接疾病经济负担、间接疾病经济负担和无形疾病经济负担。

直接经济负担:指直接用于预防和治疗疾病的总费用,包括直接医疗经济负担和直接非医疗经济负担两部分。直接医疗经济负担是指在医药保健部门购买卫生服务的花费,主要包括门诊费(如挂号费、检查费、处置费、诊断费、急救费等)、住院费(如手术费、治疗费等)和药费等。直接非医疗经济负担包括和疾病有关的营养费、交通费、住宿费、膳食费、陪护费和财产损失等。

间接经济负担:指由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人和社会带来的有效劳动力损失而导致的经济损失。具体包括:劳动工作时间损失、个人工作能力和效率降低造成的损失、陪护病人时损失的劳动工作时间、精神损失等。

无形经济负担:指患者及亲友因疾病在心理、精神和生活上遭受的痛苦、悲哀、不便等生活质量下降而产生的无形损失。

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.