Search
Close this search box.

Strategic Thinking on Strengthening China’s National Immunization Program

Yanfeng Ge
Shenglan Tang
Jiahui Zhang
Shenglan Liu

Executive Summary

Implementing immunization programs is the most cost-effective way for infectious disease control. China’s national immunization program (NIP) has achieved remarkable progress over the past decades, though there is still room for optimization to achieve effective development in the future. China’s NIP has not been expanded for nearly 15 years, and several internationally recognized cost-effective vaccines, such as the HPV, PCV, Hib, and Rota Virus vaccines, are not included in the current NIP. Some high-risk population groups, such as the elderly and health workers, are not sufficiently covered by related vaccines. The financing of China’s NIP has primarily relied on government funding to pay for NIP vaccines and support its operation. The health insurance fund, which has been used in some developed countries as an important payer for vaccines, basically does not pay for vaccines in China. The current financing strategy has largely constrained the expansion of the NIP, and the high price of the non-NIP vaccines is a great barrier to increasing its coverage. In addition, there are other challenges in expanding the NIP, such as insufficient vaccine research and development capacity, production capacity, and low incentives for the vaccination services delivery. The vaccination rates for several key non-NIP vaccines have been low, and imbalanced among regions of different economic development. It has led to a high disease burden of related vaccine-preventable diseases and generated a negative impact on achieving health equity.

The past two years have observed significant improvement in China’s vaccine development, production, and vaccination service delivery capacity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Taking this opportunity, it is highly recommended to establish a dynamic expansion strategy for China’s NIP as soon as possible and diversify the financing channels of the NIP (explore possible financing channels such as public health insurance fund, private health insurance, and out-of-pocket payment, etc.), and improve the R&D, procurement, and services delivery for key vaccines, as important efforts to optimize the implementation of the NIP and effectively increase vaccination rates.

Thanks to

This study is an output of the Innovation Lab for Vaccine and Immunization Service Delivery project supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-034554). The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was not involved in the design, analysis, or writing of this article. The authors are solely responsible for the content of this article and do not represent the views of the funder.

We are grateful for the support of Duke Kunshan University as the project lead, and for the technical support provided by all the partner universities, government agencies, and institutions. In addition, special thanks to the experts who provided valuable input and technical support for this brief, especially Dr. Wenzhou Yu, Director of the Center for Immunization Planning at the CDC, Dr. Heng (Anna) Du, Senior Program Officer at the Gates Foundation, Dr. Wenfeng Gong, Senior Strategy Officer, Professor Weibing Wang at the School of Public Health at Fudan University, and Ms. Duanduan Yuan, a veteran pharmaceutical and health writer and former senior pharmaceutical reporter at Southern Weekend.

Authors

geyanfeng
Yanfeng Ge

Yanfeng Ge has been engaged in social policy research at the Development Research Center of the State Council since 1990. He is now a researcher and first-level inspector in the Social Security and Health Care Research Department, Social and Cultural Development Research Department.

Main research areas include social security, labor and employment, health care system reform, education system reform, and public sector reform. He has participated in and led many policy research works in related fields. In recent years, he has focused on medical and health policies and aging issues.

tangshenglan
Shenglan Tang

Shenglan Tang, Mary D B T and James Semans International Professor of Medicine and Global Health at the Department of Population Health Science, Duke Medical School Professor, Duke Kunshan University.

Dr. Shenglan Tang is Professor of Medicine and Global Health at Duke Global Health Institute. He is also Associate Director of DGHI for China Initiatives, and Executive Director of Global Health Program at Duke Kunshan University in China, as well as Director of Research Hub for Asia-Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies/WHO, which has research projects in Cambodia, Nepal, Vietnam and other Asian countries. In his capacity at Duke Kunshan University, he was elected as President of Chinese Consortium of Universities for Global Health (CCUGH) in November 2015. Tang has more than 30 years of experience undertaking research on health systems reform, disease control and maternal and child health in China and other countries, and has provided consultancy services on health systems strengthening to many international organizations and governments of developing countries. In 2012, Tang came to Duke from the UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), based in Geneva, where he was Unit Leader for TB/HIV and Health Systems. Before his assignment at WHO, Tang was a faculty member at Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine in UK, and School of Public Health of Fudan University (former Shanghai Medical University).

jiahuizhang
Jiahui Zhang

Jiahui Zhang, Director of Social Security and Health Care Research Department, Social and Cultural Development Research Department, Development Research Center of the State Council.

Her main research areas are health policy and elderly service policy. In the past five years, she has participated in more than 20 international and domestic cooperative research projects and served as the main coordinator of several research projects. She has conducted in-depth and systematic research on the construction of multi-level medical security systems, improvement of graded diagnosis and treatment systems, deepening reform of drug policies, financing and salary systems of public hospitals, prevention and control strategies of major infectious diseases, scientific response to population aging, construction of elderly service systems and personnel training, and long-term care insurance. Her research and policy recommendations, such as deepening reform in the field of pharmaceuticals, conducting national negotiations on the prices of special drugs, development goals of the elderly service system, and key issues of legislation on elderly services, have been approved by leaders and have played an active role in policy adjustment in related fields.

liushenglan
Shenglan Liu
Shenglan Liu, Associate Researcher, Department of Social and Cultural Development Research, Development Research Center of the State Council.

She is mainly engaged in policy research related to medical and health system reform, medical security, drug policy and pharmaceutical innovation. She has completed several related topics and authored or co-authored many research reports. The topics she has participated in include "Research on some key issues of future medical and health system reform", "Research on major public policies to actively deal with population issues", "Healthy aging: a two-wheel drive between policy and industry", "Improving fertility and related policies", and "The development of a new health care system." She is also the project leader of the study on "Breaking the Barriers to Commercial Health Insurance Development and Improving Multi-level Medical Security System".

Other Papers

Implement comprehensive vaccination policies to promote uptake of the influenza vaccine in China

Annual influenza epidemics are estimated to result in about 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness, and about 290 000 to 650 000 respiratory deaths worldwide. Influenza outbreaks often occur in crowded settings, such as schools, kindergartens, and nursing homes. However, vaccination remains the most cost-effective way to prevent influenza infection and its complications. Alas, the current influenza vaccination coverage in China remains disconcertingly low, ranging between a mere 2% and 4%, considerably lagging behind vaccination rates in Western countries and underscoring a palpable scope for substantial augmentation. To promote influenza vaccination, many countries have implemented effective interventions and gained experiences in policy advocacy, improving access to vaccination, incentivizing services providers, and monitoring influenza vaccination behaviors and social drivers.

We analyzed and summarized the status and challenges in using flu vaccine in China via comparing and leveraging the policy experiences from other countries. It is suggested that China should take comprehensive policy interventions on influenza vaccine health education, financing mechanisms, service system, research and development, production and supply, and monitoring and evaluation. These interventions can help increase public awareness of influenza and vaccines, improve access to immunization services, reduce the burden of costs, guarantee the manufacturers’ production and market supply, and generate high-quality research evidence, and ultimately increase influenza vaccine coverage and facilitate its introduction into China’s National Immunization Program.

Read more »

Regional Pilots and Improvement Strategies of HPV-Vaccination-Friendly Policies

The age-standardized incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer in China are rapidly growing and it increasingly affects younger individuals, underscoring the critical need for the accelerated uptake of the HPV vaccine. Since 2021, several local governments have successively introduced policies to support HPV vaccination uptake, advancing the vaccination of eligible girls/women via free or subsidized vaccination. Such pilots have increased the local HPV vaccination rate and had a positive demonstration effect. This article sorts out the main practices of the local vaccination policies, and issues and challenges encountered in vaccination strategy optimization, vaccine price negotiation, vaccine manufacturing capacity distribution, etc. It proposes to further optimize local vaccination strategies by referring to WHO recommendations to reduce the number of doses, optimize subsidy strategies to improve the efficiency of fund use, remove academic or household registration restrictions to expand the target population size, disseminate core information about vaccination to eliminate public misunderstandings, and establish sustainable financing mechanisms. It also suggests reducing vaccination costs through price negotiations and joint procurement, supporting and guiding manufacturers to expand vaccine production capacity, assessing the implementation effects of local vaccination policies, organizing experience exchanges, expanding project impact, and supporting more regions in advancing the uptake of HPV vaccine.

Read more »

代表性地区的基本情况、接种政策及效果、宣传推动情况

(1) 成都市

 

基本情况

成都市2022年度GDP为20817.5亿元,排名全国城市第七。成都市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式成都市宫颈癌综合防控试点工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次、进口二价0-1-6三剂次、进口四价0-2-6三剂次。资助政策为国产二价疫苗(沃泽惠)免费,其它疫苗补贴600元/人,并自付20元/剂接种费。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,由学校所在地预防接种单位负责。截至2022年1月,目标人群首针接种率达90.04%[14]。

宣传推动

成都市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,覆盖相关医疗机构300余、社区300余个、和公众场所90余个。面向适龄女孩及监护人、适龄女性及全体市民开展广泛宣教,宣传材料发放至近9万名群众,讲座活动覆盖近2万名群众。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(2) 济南市

 

基本情况

济南市2022年度GDP为12027.5亿元,位列全国城市排名20。2021年,济南市出台《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点一济南市宫颈癌综合防治工作方案(2021—2025年)》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为≤14周岁且无HPV疫苗接种史的在校七年级女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策免费接种。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,安排分班级分时段前往学校所在地的预防接种单位进行接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率达
94.4%[15].

宣传推动

济南市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括采访、线上线下专题活动,载体包括网络媒体、纸媒、科普展板、宣传手册、子宫颈癌与HPV疫苗知识读本、济南HPV疫苗接种手册,宣教人群广泛涵盖全体市民,宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控等知识。

(3) 鄂尔多斯市

 

基本情况

鄂尔多斯市2022年度GDP为5613.44亿元,全国地级市第45位。2021年,鄂尔多斯市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康鄂尔多斯行动创新模式工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

2020年8月,鄂尔多斯市在准格尔旗率先开展HPV疫苗免费接种项目。目标人群为全市当年13-18岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为进口二价0-1-6三剂次,

2023年起调整为13-14岁女孩0-6二剂次。资助政策为疫苗免费,自付20元/剂接种费。组织方式为疫苗接种服务中心根据任务安排联系学校,有规划的通知适龄女孩前来完成HPV疫苗接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率接近70%[16]。

2022年8月,启动准格尔旗和达拉特旗高三女生接种四价和九价HPV疫苗的试点工作,利用暑假时间展开接种,力争在2023年年底达成90%的接种目标[17]。自鄂尔多斯之后,由政府主导的HPV疫苗惠民行动在多地等涌现。值得注意的是,近年来多主体参与到HPV疫苗支持项目,如慈善总会、医院、妇联等为主体单位牵头组织开展了一些公益活动。

宣传推动

鄂尔多斯市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,宣教人群广泛涵盖在校女孩及监护人,适龄女性及全体市民。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(4) 西安市

 

基本情况

西安市2022年度GDP为11486.51亿元,排名全国第22位。2021年,西安市出台了《西安市健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点宫颈癌综合防治工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为全市年龄满13周岁(初中)在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次,进口二价0-1-6三剂次,进口四价和进口九价0-2-6三剂次。接种政策为自愿自费。各区(县)合理设立HPV疫苗专项疫苗接种门诊承担接种任务,并及时将接种信息统一录入儿童免疫规划信息平台。

宣传推动

西安市出台了《西安市宫颈癌综合防治宣传方案》(市健办发〔2022〕12号)。通过媒体宣传、社区活动、义诊等形式,宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信公众号、报纸等载体普及宫颈癌防治相关知识。

(5) 西藏自治区

 

基本情况

西藏自治区2022年度GDP为2132.64亿元,经济总量整体规模相对其他省份较小,人均GDP处于全国中等偏下水平。2022年出台《西藏自治区妇女“两癌”综合防治工作实施方案》等系列政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策为免费。由学校组织,接种者在商定接种时间携带个人身份证明材料与法定监护人一同前往定点接种单位接种。

宣传推动

充分利用网络、电视、广播、报刊等媒介,以群众喜闻乐见的宣传方式,对适龄在校女生HPV疫苗接种工作的意义及内容进行广泛宣传。

近年来各地HPV疫苗惠民项目信息

“疾病负担”指标解读

疾病负担(burden of disease, BOD)是指疾病造成的失能(伤残)、生活质量下降和过早死亡对健康和社会造成的总损失,包括疾病的流行病学负担和经济负担两个方面。

 

在疾病的流行病学方面,衡量疾病负担的常用指标包括传统指标和综合指标。

 

传统指标

传统疾病负担的衡量指标包括:用于描述和反映健康状况与水平的常规指标,如死亡人数、伤残人数和患病人数等绝对数指标;以及用来比较不同特征人群疾病分布差异的指标,如发病率、伤残率、患病率、死亡率、门诊和住院率等相对数指标。

 

上述传统疾病负担的衡量指标基本上只考虑了人口的生存数量,而忽略了生存质量,不够全面;但优势在于资料相对计算方便,结果直观,可用于各种疾病的一般性描述。

 

综合指标

疾病负担不等同于死亡人数,综合指标弥补了传统指标的单一性,且可以让各种不同疾病造成的负担之间相互比较。

 

潜在寿命损失年(YPLL):通过疾病造成的寿命损失来估计疾病负担的大小。但忽略了疾病造成的失能对生存质量的影响。

 

伤残调整寿命年(DALYs):将死亡和失能相结合,用一个指标来描述疾病的这两方面的负担。它包括因早死造成健康生命年的损失(YLL)和因伤残造成健康生命年的损失(YLD),即DALY=YLL+YLD。目前,DALY是国内外一致公认的最具代表性、运用最多的疾病负担评价指标。

 

健康期望寿命(HALE):指具有良好健康状态的生命年以及个体在比较舒适的状态下生活的平均预期时间,综合考虑生命的质量和数量两方面。

 

 

随着疾病负担研究的深入,其测量范围从流行病学负担扩大到经济负担。

 

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病所消耗的经济资源。

详细见:疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.

什么是“年龄标化”?

在流行病学研究中,年龄是多种疾病的危险因素。以发病率为例,该指标反映了一定时期内,特定人群中癌症新发病例的情况。由于年龄是癌症发生的一个重要影响因素,年龄越大,发病率就越高。

 

如果两个国家的人群年龄结构相差很大,例如A市老年人口比例更大,B市年轻人口占比更高,直接比较两地癌症发病率的高低,我们不能确定发病率较高的市,是因为年龄构成不同还是因为其他影响因素(如饮食习惯、环境等)所导致。因此,需要用“年龄标化”的统计学方法,进一步处理数据,排除年龄影响因素的干扰,再来比较两地的发病率数据。

 

以发病率为例,即把原始数据套到一个“标准年龄结构人群里”,计算出”年龄标化发病率“,这样人群结构不同的A市和B市,就能在同一个指标尺度下进行“发病率”比较。年龄标化通常有“中标率”,即我国各地基于某一年份的中国人口年龄结构构成作为标准计算,国内不同地区的疾病数据比较采用的是“中标率”;另一种是“世标率”,即用世界标准人口构成机型标化计算,适用于国与国之间的指标比较。

 

同样地,以死亡率为例,应特别注意各之间地人口构成的差异。用标准化死亡率进行比较才能得出正确结论。如甲、乙两地在未标化前的肺癌死亡率相同,但实际上乙地人群的肺癌死亡率要明显地高于甲地,其原因在于甲地男性老年人口居多,而肺癌的死亡率又与年龄和性别有关,所以用未标化率进行比较时,就会得出甲乙两地肺癌死亡率相同的错误结论。

 

参考资料:

 

张科宏教授:年龄标化的患病率 – 丁香公开课 (dxy.cn)

科学网—癌症(粗)发病率与标化发病率的区别 – 杨雷的博文 (sciencenet.cn)

WHO年龄标化死亡率定义及计算方法

沈洪兵,齐秀英. 流行病学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2015.

疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病的费用。通过计算疾病的经济负担,可以从经济层面上研究或比较不同疾病对人群健康的影响。

总疾病经济负担包括直接疾病经济负担、间接疾病经济负担和无形疾病经济负担。

直接经济负担:指直接用于预防和治疗疾病的总费用,包括直接医疗经济负担和直接非医疗经济负担两部分。直接医疗经济负担是指在医药保健部门购买卫生服务的花费,主要包括门诊费(如挂号费、检查费、处置费、诊断费、急救费等)、住院费(如手术费、治疗费等)和药费等。直接非医疗经济负担包括和疾病有关的营养费、交通费、住宿费、膳食费、陪护费和财产损失等。

间接经济负担:指由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人和社会带来的有效劳动力损失而导致的经济损失。具体包括:劳动工作时间损失、个人工作能力和效率降低造成的损失、陪护病人时损失的劳动工作时间、精神损失等。

无形经济负担:指患者及亲友因疾病在心理、精神和生活上遭受的痛苦、悲哀、不便等生活质量下降而产生的无形损失。

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.