Combination Vaccine Coverage in China

Combination Vaccine Coverage in China

1) Pentavalent vaccines (2019-2021)

A study on the usage and coverage of pentavalent vaccines in nine provincial-level administrative divisions (PLAD) of China (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Anhui, Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan, Guizhou, and Gansu) revealed (Table 1) that from 2019 to 2021, a total of 6.79 million doses of pentavalent vaccines were administered. Among them, Zhejiang Province commanded the highest vaccine utilization each year. From 2019 to 2020, pentavalent vaccines per 100 newborns increased significantly by 54.66%. From 2020 to 2021, it grew by 24.13%. Anhui showed the most significant growth, while Gansu’s growth remained slow. Regionally, the dosage rate in the eastern region was consistently the highest, approximately double that of its western counterpart¹.

Table 1: Usage of Pentavalent Vaccines in 9 Provinces/Regions of China from 2019 to 2021 (Expressed as doses per 100 newborns)

PLADs201920202021Year-on-year growth rate in 2020 (%)Year-on-year growth rate in 2021 (%)
Eastern Region37.4261.2378.4163.6328.05
Jiangsu33.0457.2476.8273.2534.21
Zhejiang64.5798.12122.4151.9824.75
Shandong21.7136.3245.7967.3326.06
Central Region23.0734.4843.8149.527.06
Anhui14.1725.5440.1980.2757.35
Hubei31.345.761.384634.31
Hunan1625.0632.9956.6231.62
Western Region19.7328.4735.4844.2924.63
Sichuan33.7849.2863.0645.8827.97
Guizhou6.0310.0812.6667.1625.59
Gansu7.8610.6212.2135.1515.02
Overall28.8144.5655.3254.6624.13
Abbreviation: PLADs = Provincial Administrative Divisions

Source: https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/doi/10.46234/ccdcw2024.083

The number of pentavalent vaccine doses increased gradually from 1.83 million doses in 2019 and 2.35 million doses in 2020 to 2.61 million doses in 2021, with an average annual growth rate of 19.32%. Most of the dosage was concentrated in the eastern regions, with the western regions showing the lowest use. The study also examined the substitution ratio of pentavalent vaccines for DTP vaccines across different provincial administrative regions (Table 2), referred to as the “pentavalent substitution rate.” The overall substitution rate significantly increased from 7.61% in 2019 to 13.83% in 2021. The eastern region reported the highest substitution rate in 2019, while the central region had the lowest; the western region reported the lowest substitution rates in 2020 and 2021¹.

Table 2: Pentavalent Vaccine Usage and Substitution Rate (%) in 9 PLAD of China from 2019 to 2021

PLADs201920202021Annual growth rate of doses (%)
Number of Pentavalent (×10,000 doses)Substitution rate (%)Number of Pentavalent (×10,000 doses)Substitution rate (%)Number of Pentavalent (×10,000 doses)Substituion rate (%)
Eastern Region105.999.97136.0114.71149.419.2618.73
Jiangsu27.3610.0437.4313.6342.9918.625.35
Zhejiang52.9220.0366.1428.9671.5534.6916.28
Shandong25.714.8832.447.6934.8610.316.44
Central Region40.685.4853.18.0561.2211.0422.68
Anhui103.915.166.6719.7410.2640.5
Hubei19.228.722.9511.825.0515.4114.16
Hunan11.464.3314.996.3116.438.2419.74
Western Region36.366.0745.886.8749.969.0217.22
Sichuan30.149.5537.0912.6440.3515.4315.7
Guizhou4.132.066.12.76.673.5127.08
Gansu2.092.522.691.822.942.8918.6
Overall183.037.61234.9910.43260.5813.8319.32

Source: https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/doi/10.46234/ccdcw2024.083

2) Pentavalent vaccine dosage administered by sampling institutions in different PLADs.

In 2020, the total number of pentavalent vaccine doses administered by sampling institutions in different provinces across the country was 446,649. When divided by the eastern, central, and western regions, the eastern region had the highest total with 242,524 doses (54.3%), followed by the central region with 139,019 doses (31.1%), and the western region had the lowest total with 65,106 doses (14.6%).

PLADsVaccination volume (doses)PLADsVaccination volume (doses)
Beijing22476Shandong34037
Tianjin8960Henan36660
Anhui19051Hubei41894
Shanxi4736Hunan27169
Inner Mongolia0Guangdong39623
Liaoning16327Guangxi23567
Jilin491Hainan4201
Heilongjiang1528Chongqing6423
Jiangsu18836Guizhou5475
Zhejiang55553Yunnan20459
Anhui17479Shaanxi7451
Fujian23460Gansu194
Jiangxi9062Qinghai1537
Source: NHDRC

3) Pentavalent vaccination dosage in different types of sampled institutions in 2020

In 2020, the dosage of pentavalent vaccines administered by different healthcare facilities varies.  We listed the types of healthcare facilities by the number of pentavalent vaccine dosages in descending order: community health service centers (51.1% of the total), maternity and child healthcare hospitals/institutes/clinics, township hospitals, general hospitals, centers of disease control and prevention, family planning service centers, traditional Chinese medicine hospitals and integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine hospitals, and specialized hospitals (only 0.8% of the total).

Type of organizationVaccination volume (doses)
General Hospital38439
Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals and Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospitals8811
Specialized Hospital3867
Community Health Service Center228317
Township Hospitals59451
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)21809
Maternal and Child Health Hospitals/institutes/clinics72177
Family Planning Service Center13275
Source: NHDRC

4) Pentavalent vaccination dosage in different types of sampled institutions by profit nature in 2020

China National Health Development Research Center disclosed that the pentavalent vaccination dosage in non-profit medical institutions was much higher than that in for-profit medical institutions, which was about 61 times higher.

Nature of organizationVaccination volume (doses)
Non-profit439473
Profit-oriented7176
Source: NHDRC

We list the coverage rates of combination vaccines in China based on several recent studies. Overall, the coverage of quadrivalent and pentavalent vaccines in China is relatively low.

1)  The national-level vaccination coverage rate for pentavalent vaccines.

Studies on the coverage rate of the pentavalent vaccine in nine PLADs of China (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Anhui, Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan, Guizhou, and Gansu) showed an increased trend of coverage. However, the overall coverage rate remains low.

Table 3: Pentavalent Vaccine Coverage Rate for Children Aged 2–18 Months in 9 Provinces/Regions of China from 2019 to 2021

PLADs201920202021
≥1 doseCompleted Primary dosesBooster dose≥1 doseCompleted Primary dosesBooster dose≥1 doseCompleted Primary dosesBooster dose
Eastern Region16.0210.821.7522.315.728.4727.8418.7314.33
Jiangsu25.1391.0937.8214.887.3348.5418.512.79
Zhejiang21.318.883.5325.9325.3214.4230.4329.2523.72
Shandong6.056.61.098.369.325.2210.6510.888.68
Central Region7.815.331.1611.558.044.2515.7710.626.93
Anhui5.313.880.497.596.782.8611.39.936.99
Hubei10.378.14212.6711.326.0316.3314.669.3
Hunan8.094.371.1214.526.524.119.727.954.87
Western Region7.75.70.998.528.264.339.389.027.43
Sichuan13.349.921.7814.6114.427.616.4515.9313
Guizhou2.221.710.243.092.71.263.443.222.36
Gansu2.991.980.363.152.771.523.4132.35
Overall11.257.751.3715.0411.256.0518.7413.4210.13

Source: https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/doi/10.46234/ccdcw2024.083

In 2019, the coverage rate for ≥1 dose of pentavalent vaccine was 11.25%, which increased to 18.74% in 2021. The coverage rate for completing the primary vaccination series was 7.75% in 2019, expanding to 13.42% in 2021. The coverage rate for booster doses rose from 1.37% in 2019 to 10.13% in 2021. Jiangsu consistently had the highest annual coverage rate for ≥1 dose, while the provinces with the lowest coverage rates were Guizhou (in 2019 and 2020) and Gansu (in 2021). The eastern region had the highest ≥1 dose vaccination rate, completion rate of the primary series, and booster dose coverage rate. In 2021, ≥1 dose vaccination rate in the eastern region was 1.77 times that of the central region. Moreover, coverage rates were consistently higher in urban and rural areas. In urban areas, the coverage rate was 16.33% in 2019, rising to 26.22% in 2021. In contrast, rural areas had significantly lower rates, with 4.91% in 2019 and an increase to 9.45% in 2021.

2)Coverage Rates in Different Provinces and Cities

A study in Wuhan showed that as of December 31, 2022, the cumulative vaccination coverage rates for the pentavalent vaccine in children aged 0-6 years were 22.87%, 21.46%, 20.54%, and 14.28% for the 1st to 4th dose, respectively. As the birth year moved forward, the coverage rates for each dose of the pentavalent vaccine showed an upward trend, while the coverage rates for each birth cohort gradually decreased, possibly due to the complexity of the vaccination schedule, which led to lower parental compliance. The study estimated that the coverage rates for the pentavalent vaccine in Wuhan ranged from 6.94% to 34.67% for the 1st to 4th doses².

A 2022 study analyzed children’s vaccination data from 2015 to 2021 from Jiangsu Province’s Comprehensive Vaccination Service Management Information System. The results showed that the cumulative number of pentavalent vaccine doses administered to children aged 0-6 years in Jiangsu Province was 473,900, 441,900, 402,700, and 217,100 doses for the 1st to 4th dose, respectively. The vaccination rates were 7.65%, 7.14%, 6.50%, and 3.51%, respectively. The vaccination rate in southern Jiangsu was higher than in other regions, and the vaccination rate was higher among children with permanent residential permits than the migrant children group, indicating a distribution imbalance between regions3.

Another study in Beijing involved 480 guardians of children aged 0-3 (born between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018), sampled from 30 vaccination units. The results showed that the coverage rate for the pentavalent vaccine was only 12.08%4. This finding was similar to an investigation in Fengtai District’s Puhuangyu area in Beijing (11.81%) 5 but higher than the coverage rates found in other cities, such as Shapingba District in Chongqing (3.46%)6, Beitang District in Wuxi (5.36%)7, Cixi City (9.57%)6, and Keqiao District in Shaoxing (8.21%)9.

Several studies have found that the vaccination rate for the pentavalent vaccine is lower than that for other types of non-NIP vaccines. For example, the coverage rate for the inactivated Japanese encephalitis vaccine in Cixi City was 20%, and the full vaccination rate for the Meningococcal A and C conjugate vaccine in Henan Province had already reached 27.04%10.

Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital surveyed between June 2018 and June 2019, selecting 600 preschool children aged 0-6 to investigate their vaccination status for non-scheduled vaccines8. The results showed that the vaccination rates for the quadrivalent and pentavalent vaccines were not ideal, with local children having higher vaccination rates than migrant children. Of the 343 children eligible for the quadrivalent vaccine, only 2 completed the full vaccination schedule, with a completion rate of 0.58%. Of the 171 children eligible for the pentavalent vaccine, 6 completed the full vaccination schedule, with a higher completion rate of 3.51% compared to the quadrivalent vaccine. The highest vaccination rate for non-NIP vaccines in this survey was for the varicella vaccine, at 76.26%, while the full vaccination rate for the rotavirus vaccine was the lowest, at 0.39%, slightly lower than the coverage rate for the quadrivalent vaccine.

Content Editor:Xiaotong Yang

Page Editor:Ziqi Liu


1 Li Li, Hui Liang, Yifan Song, Zhaonan Zhang, Jing An, Ning Li, Huifeng Sun, Ying Bao, Leijin Mao, Lin Ding, Jie Yan, Zhiguo Wang, Lei Cao, Jiakai Ye, Wenzhou Yu. Coverage of the Combined DTaP-IPV/Hib Vaccine Among Children Aged 2–18 Months — 9 PLADs, China, 2019–2021[J]. China CDC Weekly, 2024, 6(19): 418-423. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2024.083

2. Liu Yijun, Chen Dajie, Xiong Yuehua, Yang Xiaobing, Zou Jiaojiao, Pei Hongbing. Dynamic Analysis of DTaP-IPV/Hib Combined Vaccine Coverage in the Birth Cohort of 0–6-Year-Old Children in Wuhan (2016–2022). Chinese Primary Health Care. 2024(01): 59–62. (In Chinese). 

3. Yu Jing et al. Evaluation of DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine Coverage in the Birth Cohort of 0–6-Year-Old Children in Jiangsu Province, 2021. Modern Preventive Medicine. 2022(23): 4385–4389(In Chinese).  . 

4. Liu Li et al. Investigation and Analysis of Factors Influencing DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine Coverage in Beijing. Capital Public Health. 2021(5). (In Chinese).

5. Zhang Xiaohui et al. Analysis of Second-Class Vaccine Coverage in 0–3-Year-Old Children in Puhuangyu, Fengtai District, Beijing. Capital Public Health. 2017, 11(3): 130–133. (In Chinese)

6. Huang Liping et al. Investigation of Second-Class Vaccine Coverage and Influencing Factors in Preschool Children in Shapingba District, Chongqing. Practical Preventive Medicine. 2016(23), Issue (4): 419–422.  (In Chinese). 

7. Wang Yao, Cao Xiaoping, Li Tingting. Current Status and Analysis of Second-Class Vaccine Coverage in 0–2-Year-Old Children in Beitang District, Wuxi. Disease Surveillance and Control. 2016, 10(6): 452–454.  (In Chinese). 

8. Wang Yanru. Analysis of Coverage and Influencing Factors of Four Second-Class Vaccines in Children in Cixi City. Preventive Medicine. 2020(32), Issue (3): 292–294.  (In Chinese). 

9. Hu Yuchao. Analysis of Second-Class Vaccine Coverage in 1–7-Year-Old Children in Keqiao District. Preventive Medicine. 2019(31), Issue (9): 927–929.  (In Chinese). 

10. Wang Jingjing. Analysis of Unscheduled Vaccination Status in 600 Preschool Children. Henan Medical Research. 2020(06): 1044–1046. (In Chinese). 

代表性地区的基本情况、接种政策及效果、宣传推动情况

(1) 成都市

 

基本情况

成都市2022年度GDP为20817.5亿元,排名全国城市第七。成都市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式成都市宫颈癌综合防控试点工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次、进口二价0-1-6三剂次、进口四价0-2-6三剂次。资助政策为国产二价疫苗(沃泽惠)免费,其它疫苗补贴600元/人,并自付20元/剂接种费。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,由学校所在地预防接种单位负责。截至2022年1月,目标人群首针接种率达90.04%[14]。

宣传推动

成都市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,覆盖相关医疗机构300余、社区300余个、和公众场所90余个。面向适龄女孩及监护人、适龄女性及全体市民开展广泛宣教,宣传材料发放至近9万名群众,讲座活动覆盖近2万名群众。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(2) 济南市

 

基本情况

济南市2022年度GDP为12027.5亿元,位列全国城市排名20。2021年,济南市出台《健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点一济南市宫颈癌综合防治工作方案(2021—2025年)》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为≤14周岁且无HPV疫苗接种史的在校七年级女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策免费接种。疫苗接种按照属地化管理原则,安排分班级分时段前往学校所在地的预防接种单位进行接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率达
94.4%[15].

宣传推动

济南市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括采访、线上线下专题活动,载体包括网络媒体、纸媒、科普展板、宣传手册、子宫颈癌与HPV疫苗知识读本、济南HPV疫苗接种手册,宣教人群广泛涵盖全体市民,宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控等知识。

(3) 鄂尔多斯市

 

基本情况

鄂尔多斯市2022年度GDP为5613.44亿元,全国地级市第45位。2021年,鄂尔多斯市出台了《健康城市建设推动健康鄂尔多斯行动创新模式工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

2020年8月,鄂尔多斯市在准格尔旗率先开展HPV疫苗免费接种项目。目标人群为全市当年13-18岁在校且无HPV疫苗接种史女生。免疫程序为进口二价0-1-6三剂次,

2023年起调整为13-14岁女孩0-6二剂次。资助政策为疫苗免费,自付20元/剂接种费。组织方式为疫苗接种服务中心根据任务安排联系学校,有规划的通知适龄女孩前来完成HPV疫苗接种。截至2022年11月,目标人群首针接种率接近70%[16]。

2022年8月,启动准格尔旗和达拉特旗高三女生接种四价和九价HPV疫苗的试点工作,利用暑假时间展开接种,力争在2023年年底达成90%的接种目标[17]。自鄂尔多斯之后,由政府主导的HPV疫苗惠民行动在多地等涌现。值得注意的是,近年来多主体参与到HPV疫苗支持项目,如慈善总会、医院、妇联等为主体单位牵头组织开展了一些公益活动。

宣传推动

鄂尔多斯市开展多形式、多载体的健康教育宣传。形式包括讲座、知晓日、义诊咨询、专题课程、专题活动等,载体包括宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信、视频号、抖音平台等,宣教人群广泛涵盖在校女孩及监护人,适龄女性及全体市民。宣教内容包括HPV疫苗接种、两癌防控、其它女性常见疾病防控等。

(4) 西安市

 

基本情况

西安市2022年度GDP为11486.51亿元,排名全国第22位。2021年,西安市出台了《西安市健康城市建设推动健康中国行动创新模式试点宫颈癌综合防治工作方案》等一系列相关政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种工作。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为全市年龄满13周岁(初中)在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次,进口二价0-1-6三剂次,进口四价和进口九价0-2-6三剂次。接种政策为自愿自费。各区(县)合理设立HPV疫苗专项疫苗接种门诊承担接种任务,并及时将接种信息统一录入儿童免疫规划信息平台。

宣传推动

西安市出台了《西安市宫颈癌综合防治宣传方案》(市健办发〔2022〕12号)。通过媒体宣传、社区活动、义诊等形式,宣传册、宣传栏、展板、电视、微信公众号、报纸等载体普及宫颈癌防治相关知识。

(5) 西藏自治区

 

基本情况

西藏自治区2022年度GDP为2132.64亿元,经济总量整体规模相对其他省份较小,人均GDP处于全国中等偏下水平。2022年出台《西藏自治区妇女“两癌”综合防治工作实施方案》等系列政策推动适龄女孩HPV疫苗接种。

接种政策及效果

目标人群为13-14岁在校女生。免疫程序为国产二价0-6二剂次。资助政策为免费。由学校组织,接种者在商定接种时间携带个人身份证明材料与法定监护人一同前往定点接种单位接种。

宣传推动

充分利用网络、电视、广播、报刊等媒介,以群众喜闻乐见的宣传方式,对适龄在校女生HPV疫苗接种工作的意义及内容进行广泛宣传。

近年来各地HPV疫苗惠民项目信息

“疾病负担”指标解读

疾病负担(burden of disease, BOD)是指疾病造成的失能(伤残)、生活质量下降和过早死亡对健康和社会造成的总损失,包括疾病的流行病学负担和经济负担两个方面。

 

在疾病的流行病学方面,衡量疾病负担的常用指标包括传统指标和综合指标。

 

传统指标

传统疾病负担的衡量指标包括:用于描述和反映健康状况与水平的常规指标,如死亡人数、伤残人数和患病人数等绝对数指标;以及用来比较不同特征人群疾病分布差异的指标,如发病率、伤残率、患病率、死亡率、门诊和住院率等相对数指标。

 

上述传统疾病负担的衡量指标基本上只考虑了人口的生存数量,而忽略了生存质量,不够全面;但优势在于资料相对计算方便,结果直观,可用于各种疾病的一般性描述。

 

综合指标

疾病负担不等同于死亡人数,综合指标弥补了传统指标的单一性,且可以让各种不同疾病造成的负担之间相互比较。

 

潜在寿命损失年(YPLL):通过疾病造成的寿命损失来估计疾病负担的大小。但忽略了疾病造成的失能对生存质量的影响。

 

伤残调整寿命年(DALYs):将死亡和失能相结合,用一个指标来描述疾病的这两方面的负担。它包括因早死造成健康生命年的损失(YLL)和因伤残造成健康生命年的损失(YLD),即DALY=YLL+YLD。目前,DALY是国内外一致公认的最具代表性、运用最多的疾病负担评价指标。

 

健康期望寿命(HALE):指具有良好健康状态的生命年以及个体在比较舒适的状态下生活的平均预期时间,综合考虑生命的质量和数量两方面。

 

 

随着疾病负担研究的深入,其测量范围从流行病学负担扩大到经济负担。

 

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病所消耗的经济资源。

详细见:疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.

什么是“年龄标化”?

在流行病学研究中,年龄是多种疾病的危险因素。以发病率为例,该指标反映了一定时期内,特定人群中癌症新发病例的情况。由于年龄是癌症发生的一个重要影响因素,年龄越大,发病率就越高。

 

如果两个国家的人群年龄结构相差很大,例如A市老年人口比例更大,B市年轻人口占比更高,直接比较两地癌症发病率的高低,我们不能确定发病率较高的市,是因为年龄构成不同还是因为其他影响因素(如饮食习惯、环境等)所导致。因此,需要用“年龄标化”的统计学方法,进一步处理数据,排除年龄影响因素的干扰,再来比较两地的发病率数据。

 

以发病率为例,即把原始数据套到一个“标准年龄结构人群里”,计算出”年龄标化发病率“,这样人群结构不同的A市和B市,就能在同一个指标尺度下进行“发病率”比较。年龄标化通常有“中标率”,即我国各地基于某一年份的中国人口年龄结构构成作为标准计算,国内不同地区的疾病数据比较采用的是“中标率”;另一种是“世标率”,即用世界标准人口构成机型标化计算,适用于国与国之间的指标比较。

 

同样地,以死亡率为例,应特别注意各之间地人口构成的差异。用标准化死亡率进行比较才能得出正确结论。如甲、乙两地在未标化前的肺癌死亡率相同,但实际上乙地人群的肺癌死亡率要明显地高于甲地,其原因在于甲地男性老年人口居多,而肺癌的死亡率又与年龄和性别有关,所以用未标化率进行比较时,就会得出甲乙两地肺癌死亡率相同的错误结论。

 

参考资料:

 

张科宏教授:年龄标化的患病率 – 丁香公开课 (dxy.cn)

科学网—癌症(粗)发病率与标化发病率的区别 – 杨雷的博文 (sciencenet.cn)

WHO年龄标化死亡率定义及计算方法

沈洪兵,齐秀英. 流行病学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2015.

疾病的“经济负担”怎么计算?

疾病经济负担是由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人、家庭以及社会带来的经济损失,和由于预防治疗疾病的费用。通过计算疾病的经济负担,可以从经济层面上研究或比较不同疾病对人群健康的影响。

总疾病经济负担包括直接疾病经济负担、间接疾病经济负担和无形疾病经济负担。

直接经济负担:指直接用于预防和治疗疾病的总费用,包括直接医疗经济负担和直接非医疗经济负担两部分。直接医疗经济负担是指在医药保健部门购买卫生服务的花费,主要包括门诊费(如挂号费、检查费、处置费、诊断费、急救费等)、住院费(如手术费、治疗费等)和药费等。直接非医疗经济负担包括和疾病有关的营养费、交通费、住宿费、膳食费、陪护费和财产损失等。

间接经济负担:指由于发病、伤残(失能)和过早死亡给患者本人和社会带来的有效劳动力损失而导致的经济损失。具体包括:劳动工作时间损失、个人工作能力和效率降低造成的损失、陪护病人时损失的劳动工作时间、精神损失等。

无形经济负担:指患者及亲友因疾病在心理、精神和生活上遭受的痛苦、悲哀、不便等生活质量下降而产生的无形损失。

 

参考资料:

陈文. 卫生经济学 [M]. 人民卫生出版社. 2017.

李茜瑶,周莹,黄辉等.疾病负担研究进展[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(05):777-780.